Applied Functional Analysis by Zeidler

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a question from "Applied Functional Analysis" by Zeidler regarding the density of the subset S of continuous functions on [a,b] with u(a)>0 in the space X=C[a,b]. The user argues that this subset cannot be dense, providing a contradiction based on the definition of density and the maximum norm. Other participants confirm this conclusion, suggesting a possible typo in the text and noting that the set with u(a)=1 also fails to be dense, despite being described as such in the book.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of functional analysis concepts, specifically density in normed spaces.
  • Familiarity with the space of continuous functions C[a,b] and maximum norm.
  • Knowledge of convex sets and their properties in functional analysis.
  • Ability to analyze mathematical contradictions and proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the definition of density in normed spaces, particularly in C[a,b].
  • Examine the properties of convex sets in functional analysis.
  • Study examples of subsets in C[a,b] and their density properties.
  • Investigate potential typos or errors in mathematical texts, focusing on "Applied Functional Analysis" by Zeidler.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of functional analysis, and anyone studying the properties of continuous functions and their applications in analysis.

_DJ_british_?
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
"Applied Functional Analysis" by Zeidler

In my book, "Applied Functional Analysis" by Zeidler, there's a question in the first chapter which, unless I got my concept of density wrong, I can't seem to see true : Let X=C[a,b] be the space of continuous functions on [a,b] with maximum norm. Then the subset S of all functions (in X) with u(a)>0 is open, convex and dense in X.

Open and convex is trivial, but how is this subset dense in X? If we take f(x)=-1, which is in X and suppose that S is dense in X, then there exists a u in S s.t. max|u(x)-f(x)|<1/2, by def. of density. But 0 < 1 < 1+u(a) = u(a)-(-1) = u(a)-f(a) = |u(a)-f(a)| =< max|u(x)-f(x)|<1/2, which implies 1 < max|u(x)-f(x)| < 1/2, a contradiction.

What I don't understand? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


_DJ_british_? said:
In my book, "Applied Functional Analysis" by Zeidler, there's a question in the first chapter which, unless I got my concept of density wrong, I can't seem to see true : Let X=C[a,b] be the space of continuous functions on [a,b] with maximum norm. Then the subset S of all functions (in X) with u(a)>0 is open, convex and dense in X.

Open and convex is trivial, but how is this subset dense in X? If we take f(x)=-1, which is in X and suppose that S is dense in X, then there exists a u in S s.t. max|u(x)-f(x)|<1/2, by def. of density. But 0 < 1 < 1+u(a) = u(a)-(-1) = u(a)-f(a) = |u(a)-f(a)| =< max|u(x)-f(x)|<1/2, which implies 1 < max|u(x)-f(x)| < 1/2, a contradiction.

What I don't understand? Thanks!

You understand perfectly well. That set is not dense. Perhaps it is just a typo in the text and they meant to write u(a)\neq 0.
 


Yeah, that's what I thought, but then the set is not convex...funny thing is, the next question is to show that the set with u(a)=1 is also open, convex and dense...which it is not. Oh well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K