Applied vs Proof Based Linear Algebra

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the choice between two linear algebra courses for a first-year physics student: one focused on applications and the other on proofs. Participants explore the implications of each course type for a physics major, considering future academic paths and the importance of proof experience.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the applied version of linear algebra would be more beneficial for a physics major, especially given the student's limited experience with proofs.
  • Others argue that a strong background in proofs is essential for success in upper-level math courses, which may be necessary for physics studies.
  • A participant shares a personal anecdote about struggling in a proof-heavy course, emphasizing the importance of having a solid foundation in proofs before tackling advanced topics.
  • There is a suggestion that proof-heavy courses designed for math majors could provide valuable tools applicable to physics, though this remains uncertain.
  • Some participants advocate for learning math from a physics perspective, arguing that application-focused courses will cover necessary theory without the complexities of formal proofs.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes the potential for deeper understanding gained from a proof-based course, despite its challenges.
  • One participant highlights the importance of considering the course texts and their alignment with the student's goals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on the value of applied versus proof-based courses, with no clear consensus emerging. Some favor the applied approach for its practicality, while others stress the importance of proofs for future studies.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that many upper-level math courses require a strong background in proofs, which may influence the decision on which linear algebra course to take. The discussion reflects varying levels of comfort with proofs and differing academic goals.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for first-year university students in physics or related fields who are considering their course options in mathematics, particularly those weighing the benefits of applied versus proof-based approaches.

bentleyghioda
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Hi, I’m going to be entering my first year of University this fall to study physics. In my second semester I will have to take a linear algebra course; however, my school has two different lower level linear algebra courses, and I must choose one. One course is focused more on applications of linear algebra, while the other is more focused on proofs. These are the descriptions of the two courses:

MATH 232: Linear equations, matrices, determinants. Introduction to vector spaces and linear transformations and bases. Complex numbers. Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; diagonalization. Inner products and orthogonality; least squares problems. An emphasis on applications involving matrix and vector calculations.

MATH 240: Linear equations, matrices, determinants. Real and abstract vector spaces, subspaces and linear transformations; basis and change of basis. Complex numbers. Eigenvalues and eigenvectors; diagonalization. Inner products and orthogonality; least squares problems. Applications. Subject is presented with an abstract emphasis and includes proofs of the basic theorems.

I am wondering if I would benefit more from the proof based class or the more applied class as a physics major. I do not have a lot of experience with proofs, but I will likely be taking a discrete mathematics course the same semester as linear algebra, and from what I’ve read, this course acts as an introduction to proofs. If it helps to know, I plan on going to grad school for physics, and I would also like to take several upper level math courses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think the applied version would be more useful especially since you don’t have much proof experience. Proofs would be useful if you planned to focus on theoretical physics but even then applied uses would be more useful overall. Mathematicians benefit the most from proof based courses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
The upper level math classes may be impossible if you do not have a strong background in proofs. If they are also applied math physics classes, that would be different.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
FactChecker said:
The upper-level math classes may be impossible if you do not have a strong background in proofs. If they are also applied math physics classes, that would be different.
So true, I blocked that traumatic memory until now. I once took an Abstract Topology course thinking I took proofs in geometry class so it should be no problem. It was definition on top of definition with no end in sight and I was a lost babe in a sea of upper-level math majors. Fortunately, my prof took pity on the hubris of a poor hapless physics major and guided me to a passing grade and implicitly warning to never tread into the ocean of no return without the proper math major background.

Thanks @FactChecker for bringing back that memory on my schooling of yesteryear.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gleem and FactChecker
Thank you for your replies. I’m not sure what courses I will be taking in the future, but I will keep in mind that many upper level math courses require proofs.
 
Do you think it would be beneficial to take some proof heavy math courses that are designed for math majors? For example, would I gain any tools from these classes that could be applied to physics?
 
If your ultimate goal is physics, I think you should learn your math from the physics perspective. Those classes should cover any of the theory that you need without getting hung up on every detail that formal proofs require.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and jedishrfu
I would take the intro proof based linear algebra... Although hard, you will walk out out from the class with a deeper understanding. Plus Linear Algebra is very important in Physics. You have 1 year to prepare...
 
@bentleyghioda the other question is whether you want to take a look at more formal mathematics. The safe, focused option is to go for the course more aligned to physics. Taking the proof-based course might be more adventurous and widen your knowledge of the maths-physics landscape.
 
  • #10
Definitely take the application based class. It is a new subject for you and as a freshmen you should not overestimate your ability or over think your career. I think you will find it challenging for is my experience you will encounter much formal treatment of the subject while keeping you focused on why you are taking the course. It might be of value to find out which text each class uses and read the preface since it should contain the authors goals and methods
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K