Admissions Apply for Cambridge/Oxford PhD: Tips for Selling Yourself to Top Professors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Salah93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phd Phd admission
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a physics student in their final year at a prestigious university in Italy, who is seeking advice on how to present themselves for a potential PhD opportunity at Cambridge. Despite having a mix of grades, the student has strong research experience and a positive recommendation from their advisor, a respected scientist. The advisor is enthusiastic about supporting the student's application, which alleviates concerns about grades. The conversation highlights that the interview process may vary depending on whether the student applies to a formal CDT or directly to a research group. It emphasizes that the student's research experience and enthusiasm are critical factors in making a strong impression. Additionally, the importance of crafting a compelling motivational letter and CV is noted, as these documents will accompany the application. Overall, the focus is on leveraging research accomplishments and personal passion for the field to compensate for less-than-perfect academic grades.
Salah93
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
HI all,
I am physics student at his last year in Italy. I'm in one of the very top uni in Italy and Europe(with very strong research). I was able to enter this uni by a very hard test, similar to the physics olympiads. I was the typical top student that sometimes gets top grades and other times good grades(ex. in US: 4.00 and another time 3.7-3.
icon_cool.gif
.
But this last year I changed and I am working really hard. I am also working on my thesis(doing a good job), with praises from my advisor. Other professors during the years admitted that my thinking is really above the average student but that I should study more to get better grades.

Now, my advisor(a top scientist) wants to send me to Cambridge/Oxford for a PHD(I didn't ask anything). He knows a guy there who is searching for top students. My advisor offered to write for me a letter. And when I said yes he was very, very happy to write a letter for me. I think that also another professor(a super top in the field) that knows me well made my name.

Now imagine, by absurd, that this professor is interested in me and wants to do an interview. I haven't top grades. How can I make in front of him a good image to tell him that those grades aren't representing me? That I can complete in a top way the phd program?

I am excited by his field and I really like do this kind of things... but how can I 'sell' myself better? I am sure to be able to complete the program in the best way with very good results.

Have you any advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to give us more details:
Is it an experimental or theoretical PhD?
Is it in Cambridge or Oxford ?
Would you be applying to a CDT or would you start working in a group?
What is your current level? Are you finishing up a MSc or a BSc (or equivalent)?
 
I am on my fifth year, I. E. Msc. (Italy is 3+2)
TThe university for now is Cambridge for a theoretical position. Have you some advice?
 
Nobody cares about your bad grades - you got this interview because of promising research experience and a recommendation, not your transcript.

Just do your best at showing your competencies and enthusiasm.
 
So, can we assume that this would NOT be with one of the CDTs in Cambridge then?
Note that this makes a huge difference to the application process. Applying to a 4-year CDT is a bit like applying to grad school in the US; the process is quite formal and they will inevitably look at your grades (and you will also be doing coursework during the first year).

If you are applying for a position in a group (usually 3 years) it is a bit like applying for a job; there might be formal requirements (some universities will only accept PhD students that met certain criteria when it comes to grades., I am not sure about Cambridge) but otherwise is really up to your potential supervisor who he/she wants to hire; a strong recommendation from your current advisor will carry a lot of weight,.

Note that there is no single system in the UK at the moment when it comes to PhDs; but there is move towards more CDTs (since this is what the funding agencies seem to prefer) so the number of places where you start working directly in a group is shrinking quite rapidly.
 
The position is 3 years. I will work for a project with a specific professor. So I think is the latter case.
NOw I am applying for the graduate Cambridge (where they check the grades I think and there are also the letters from my profs)
Then I will send my Motivational letter and a Cv to the department.

Thank you guys.. If you have some advice to put in my letter feel free to write
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Back
Top