Programs Applying for a PhD Without Knowing Responsibilities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Phd
AI Thread Summary
Applying for a PhD position without clear responsibilities is not uncommon, as many researchers do not specify project details in job postings. An informal interview may focus on the candidate's interests rather than the specifics of the role, which can lead to confusion about the research direction. Candidates are encouraged to explore the lab's literature to formulate a relevant research question. Some research groups prefer to recruit students internally and may not provide detailed project outlines upfront. Sharing personal research experiences can help clarify expectations, and engaging with current students can provide insights into the lab's dynamics and work culture. While some warnings about the technical nature of the work may arise, they are often part of the research process. Taking time to reflect on the opportunity is advisable before making a decision.
Monique
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,211
Reaction score
68
I was wondering whether it is normal to apply for a PhD student position, without actually knowing what your responsibilities will be. Normally researchers advertise with a job opening in which they specify what the research question is that needs to be tackled and what techniques shall be used for it.

Today I had an informal introductory interview and I was expecting to be informed what the niche would be for the project, instead I was asked why I wanted to join the group and what I would like to study in it.. it caught me off gard, since there are a million things you could study (functional genomics of cancer biology).

So friday I'll have an official meeting with the research group and I'll be presenting some of my own research to them, but this thing feels a bit fuzzy to me. I guess I'll dive into their literature and see if I can come up with a research question that fits into the scope of their laboratory..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, it seems to me that when you were asked why you wanted the position was an excellent time to "confess" that you did not know exactly what the position entailed doing. If you don't know before that, you should certainly ask at the meeting with the group.
 
I know exactly the research track that they take, but there are 7 postdocs, 6 graduate students and 3 technitians working on 25,000 genes.. hard to know exactly what goes on behind closed doors.

I asked what the research would entail, he said he couldn't tell me: I need to find out myself. He likes to keep his students free, but normally they recruit students from inside the institution and don't advertise for positions. I'm confused, but I'll find out exactly what recent students have published in the past years and find out whether that suits me.
 
Monique said:
I'm confused, but I'll find out exactly what recent students have published in the past years and find out whether that suits me.

Great idea. I am currently doing a phd at IMEC in Leuven, Belgium. When i applied the topic of my phd was also not fixed. They more or less asked me how i would like to cooperate in the nanotechnology developments (high k dielectrics and MOSFETS more generally) given the fact i have a theoretical physics background from college. I ansered that i would like to keep the topic closely related to theory but this theory should result in clear and practical implementations. Not something like string theory :)

So the example i gave basically was DFT (density functional theory) which is used to solve the Schrodinger equation for many body physics. Then we use this code to simulate the influence of defects in the gate oxide, by using computer software...

GOOD LUCK on your application

marlon
 
marlon said:
GOOD LUCK on your application

marlon
Thanks marlon!

Today I presented my own work, had one-on-one meetings with some other PhD students in the lab and attended their work discussion over lunch (in total spent 6 hours there) and I have a clear idea now what I would like to do.

The people were fun, although I felt some were giving me all kinds of warnings.. not sure why.. I think ungrounded ("the work is very technical".. what labwork is not?; "you don't know whether after all the work you get anything interesting".. that's research; "but.. do you know how to do a western blot or do cell culture".. right.. that's basic molecular biology :rolleyes:).

I'm giving myself some time to think about it, so we'll see.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
116
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top