Applying Gauss' Law to other situations

res3210
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

I'm not sure if this belongs in the math or physics section of this forum, but I figure since my question is more related to the mathematical manipulation of what I am dealing with, I figured I would ask it here and then if it has to be moved, it can be.

My question has to do with applying gauss' law to a differential equation I am dealing with. The differential equation is the partial derivative of some function of x,y,z,t with respect to t is equal to a constant times dell^2 of that function plus another constant times the same function. The case I am considering is when the time derivative is equal to zero. So I have:

D*dell^2(n) + C*n = 0

So I am thinking I am basically dealing with a divergence of the vector dell(n) (n is a scalar function). However, I'm not sure how to apply that logic to the C*n part. Can I just subtract it to the other side and take the triple volume integral? Or does the divergence theorem not apply? I think it does because I am basically dealing with a diffusion of particles out from a spherical surface. The only difference is there are particles being generated inside of the sphere as well. That's the C*n term.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can you type in the equation using LaTex or the special symbols?
 
res3210 said:
Hey everyone,

I'm not sure if this belongs in the math or physics section of this forum, but I figure since my question is more related to the mathematical manipulation of what I am dealing with, I figured I would ask it here and then if it has to be moved, it can be.

My question has to do with applying gauss' law to a differential equation I am dealing with. The differential equation is the partial derivative of some function of x,y,z,t with respect to t is equal to a constant times dell^2 of that function plus another constant times the same function. The case I am considering is when the time derivative is equal to zero. So I have:

D*dell^2(n) + C*n = 0

So I am thinking I am basically dealing with a divergence of the vector dell(n) (n is a scalar function). However, I'm not sure how to apply that logic to the C*n part. Can I just subtract it to the other side and take the triple volume integral? Or does the divergence theorem not apply? I think it does because I am basically dealing with a diffusion of particles out from a spherical surface. The only difference is there are particles being generated inside of the sphere as well. That's the C*n term.

If you integrate your PDE over a volume, then you can indeed replace the \nabla^2 n term by an integral of \nabla n over the boundary surface, but the integrals of the other terms will remain as volume integrals.

Usually such conservation PDEs are obtained by looking at \frac{d}{dt} \int_V n\,dV and then using the divergence theorem to replace the surface term expressing the flux of n out of V with a volume integral.
 
UltrafastPED said:
Can you type in the equation using LaTex or the special symbols?

Sorry about that, I am typing from my smart phone, and I don't know how to use LaTex from this interface. Mainly because I'm not familiar with LaTex. If you know any good sources where I can learn it, I'd be willing to use it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top