Applying LSZ reduction - scattering particles - quantum theory

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
Hiyah

I was initially confused about which way to choose the sign of the momentum , since it gives arise to different exponential ^ momentum combinations and thus different deltas for the momentum conservation . I came to conclusion that it doesn’t matter as long as you are consistent . ( which I found this I Be correct when I came across this https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/452539/sign-ambiguity-when-going-from-position-to-momentum-space-evaluating-feynman-dia# ).

My question , pretty much , is the definition of consistency here . There are two things to consider I believe :

1) having some consistent pattern to which external vertices you point toward a vertex, and which away from a vertex .

2) what system you choose to denote positive and negative to : I.e right and left , up and down, or into a vertex and out of a vertex.

My choice I like to use is :
1) all point in the same direction - eg right
2) + or - given by whether in to a vertex or out

My question is are my 1) and 2) which I talk about for consistency correct ? E.g is it even correct to consider you may denote plus or minus by left / right or should it always be into and out of a vertex, regarding number 1, I feel as though the easier option is to label everything in same direction , but say I am considering variations of a diagram by keeping the external points fixed (1,2,3,4) - I believe another way of consistency woulda be to always associate the same direction with the same external point - these could be all the same , three same , one not , two-two - it does not Matter . Am I correct in thinking this is a ‘ valid move ‘ ?

Many thanks !
Relevant Equations
Above
Above
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the archesAbove the arches of a bridge is typically where the roadway is located. This area of the bridge spans the gap between the two sides and is supported by the arches beneath it. The arches are typically made of stone, brick, or concrete and are designed to distribute the weight of the bridge across the entire span.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top