Does Time Freeze Near a Black Hole's Event Horizon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuahji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
kuahji
Messages
390
Reaction score
2
In the popular science books/magazines I read, they often state that as one approaches the even horizon, eventually an observer will see an object, person, etc. freeze, as if time has stopped. But, the thing crossing crossing the horizon doesn't notice any effects (besides tidal forces & things of that nature).

Anyway, we see things around black holes such as accretion disks (or at least what we think are black holes). Wouldn't the accretion disk also appear to freeze, or slow down the closer it comes to the black hole? If so, do these effects show up in the data scientists have collected already? Just curious about this phenomenon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kuahji said:
In the popular science books/magazines I read, they often state that as one approaches the even horizon, eventually an observer will see an object, person, etc. freeze, as if time has stopped. But, the thing crossing crossing the horizon doesn't notice any effects (besides tidal forces & things of that nature).
A Schwarzschild observer (Observer at rest at infinity) would observer the time as measured on a wristwatch on a person falling into the black hole. Theoretically this observer comes closer and closer to the event horizon as time increases but will never cross it. But this is as observed by a Schwarzschild observer. As recckoned by an observer who is falling into the black hole will observer his wristwatch to be running as usual.
Anyway, we see things around black holes such as accretion disks (or at least what we think are black holes). Wouldn't the accretion disk also appear to freeze, or slow down the closer it comes to the black hole? If so, do these effects show up in the data scientists have collected already? Just curious about this phenomenon.
A Schwarzschild observer will see the matter falling into the black hole but the closer the object is to the event horizon the Schwarzschild observer will see an increasingly redshifted effect of the falling object. This means that eventually the redshift will be so great that a Schwarzschild observer will never observer matter just outside the event hoirizon. So the matter of an accretion disk will always appear to be moving.

Best regards.

Pete
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...

Similar threads

Back
Top