theJorge551
- 66
- 0
turbo-1 said:A year is nothing Jorge. Be yourself.
Yep, got that ;) thanks
turbo-1 said:A year is nothing Jorge. Be yourself.
turbo-1 said:At least in the 1960s (codger disclaimer!) the women did not have the "power" if they were much younger than than the men. And (in my limited experience) they did not have the "power" over much younger guys unless they got pretty explicit. In my case, I'd hug up my cheerleader buddy every time she grabbed me for a dance, but she would let me go back to the younger crowd each time. If she ever told me that she'd live with her folks and wait for me to graduate, I probably would have tried to graduate ahead of time.
theJorge551 said:Lmfao, I now have a goal...
But more seriously, I have noticed several subtle (by absolutely NO means "strong and clear") signs from her, though it does take a very trained eye to decipher it. I'll have to keep reading into those signs, lol
Pinu7 said:Don't decipher, ask her out!
Pinu7 said:Don't decipher, ask her out!
If a girl gives a "strong and clear signal", as per my examples, it's an incredibly refreshing experience.theJorge551 said:Lmfao, I now have a goal...
But more seriously, I have noticed several subtle (by absolutely NO means "strong and clear") signs from her, though it does take a very trained eye to decipher it. I'll have to keep reading into those signs, lol
zoobyshoe said:If a girl gives a "strong and clear signal", as per my examples, it's an incredibly refreshing experience.
I think it's possible to quickly get bogged down in trying to decipher a girl's signals, though, such that things go nowhere. Most girls are relatively passive. It's better to "lead", to actively direct things to deeper and deeper involvement, even in the absence of a clear feel for how she'll react.
There is a reason people don't send strong and clear signals.zoobyshoe said:If a girl gives a "strong and clear signal", as per my examples, it's an incredibly refreshing experience.
DaveC426913 said:There is a reason people don't send strong and clear signals.
Forgive this analogy:
Imagine being in an antique market. You spot a gorgeous piece of Art Glass. You send a clear and unambiguous signal ("Wow! I want that!") to the vendor.
How much leverage do you have on negotiating? What are your chances now that you will now come out of the bargain with the best arrangement you can get?
Roll back. Spot the Art Glass again. This time, show some serious interest but don't look like a push-over. Now what kind of leverage do you have?
Neither am I. The analogy si not about money; it is about negotiating power in a relationship.zoobyshoe said:I'm not talking about hookers, Dave.
Neither am I. The analogy is not about money; it is about negotiating power in a relationship. Any relationship.zoobyshoe said:I'm not talking about hookers, Dave.
Yeah, that one really kills me.turbo-1 said:Guys crush themselves after the fact, too, when they realize how stupid they were when ignoring ladies (older or younger) that were sending out strong and clear signals.
It's ok, but in any case while I know women get crushed too, the way they get crushed is a little different and, yes, I knew the OP was a guy.GeorginaS said:Well, likely he does know that, and I only said that because I've known a few men who seem to believe that women have all of the power in love relationships.
My apologies to Russ.
russ_watters said:It's ok, but in any case while I know women get crushed too, the way they get crushed is a little different and, yes, I knew the OP was a guy.
theJorge551 said:Lol, I know, deciphering is in the meantime. I'm not going to ask her out online (exclusively in person, IMO), so I have a little while to think before I see her again on Tuesday :P
russ waters said:It's ok, but in any case while I know women get crushed too, the way they get crushed is a little different and, yes, I knew the OP was a guy.
I'm interested to hear that, too. Does "the way they get crushed" refer to the way the rejection is delivered, or how comparatively rotten you think they feel afterward?GeorginaS said:I'm interested to hear how you think it's different.
zoobyshoe said:If a girl gives a "strong and clear signal", as per my examples, it's an incredibly refreshing experience.
DaveC426913 said:There is a reason people don't send strong and clear signals.
Forgive this analogy:
No, you don't get it. These girls aren't "tipping their hand".DaveC426913 said:Neither am I. The analogy si not about money; it is about negotiating power in a relationship.
Whatever the girls wants out of the relationship (unless it is exactly the same as what he wants), she does not do herself a favour by tipping her entire hand up front.
zoobyshoe said:I have more such tales. In all cases the girl has just taken over. She's already the one in the power seat.
GeorginaS said:I disagree, Dave, that it's about power in a relationship or leveraging for what you want and more about perception.
...on a young woman's part, trying to be a whole person who makes her own decisions while still being saddled with antiquated ideas about decorum. Dignity is another thing, and should be maintained for everyone involved. I agree with Zooby in that there's no loss of dignity in saying, "This is what I want" but the rest of the world isn't quite ready to let women have that yet.
zoobyshoe said:She turns around, stops me while the others walk into the distance, then, to my surprise, pulls me down onto the ground on top of her.
zoobyshoe said:I have more such tales. In all cases the girl has just taken over. She's already the one in the power seat.
What I'm saying is that in all cases I can offer from personal experience where the girl has sent a "strong and clear signal", she hasn't undervalued herself and lost power, she has, in fact, taken power. That was directed at Dave's contention that most girls don't initiate because they would lose power in the relationship. I actually think most girls don't initiate because they are simply prone to being passive.theJorge551 said:As much as I agree with the fact that at times, the girl in a relationship takes this role, this time I'm pretty sure that it won't apply, based on what I know so far about her. I appreciate your input though.
There's that, but my actual ulterior motive is the one evident when I first addressed turbo about this, which is to let it be known that many girls don't get what a guy will understand to be a "strong and clear signal". Girls' idea of a strong and clear signal, in many cases, can come off as a lot of pretty ambiguous mumbling. Guys really shouldn't beat themselves up when, years later an insight suddenly pops into their head, "OMG! She was coming on to me!" If it took years to decipher, how strong and clear could it actually have been?DaveC426913 said:Why zoob, I do believe you are boasting!![]()
It's how the "approach" happens and who is doing it that determines how the rejection is delivered and who gets it. In my experience from high school (only 15 years ago), it was still mostly the guys doing the asking and the girls doing the rejecting. And when girls did do the "approaching", more often than not it was a friend doing the actual approach - guys didn't do that as much because there is a stigma associated with it (and, probably, it doesn't work as well).Math Is Hard said:I'm interested to hear that, too. Does "the way they get crushed" refer to the way the rejection is delivered, or how comparatively rotten you think they feel afterward?
cronxeh said:If a woman is intelligent and gives it up easily, she is not considered to be a slut. The guy is considered to be lucky.
It is their purpose, but it's not intended to kill or maim, they just want you to go back to the drawing board and figure out what you did wrong.rootX said:I believed the purpose of their existence was to crush males when one crushed me few years ago.
zoobyshoe said:Without even knowing you or the girl I am going to guess, based on the fact she crushed you, that what you did wrong was to telegraph to her that you were bedazzled or in awe and couldn't live without her. Girls hate that and their interest is only piqued when they sense the guy can take them or leave them with equanimity.
Hmm..this could mean you were in a relationship that seemed to be going well but you caught her with another.rootX said:You make too many assumptions or guesses![]()
rootX said:I have trouble believing that an intelligent woman will give it up easily but zoob was talking about providing clear signal (which is co-related to the personal confidence) not easily giving up.
cronxeh said:Yeah okThen again, it depends on your definition of 'intelligent'. The truly top percentile seem to have no social skills, and the bottom percentile seem to have a lot of social skills to the point you want to vomit all over their kabala obsessed new age monologue
zoobyshoe said:Guys really shouldn't beat themselves up when, years later an insight suddenly pops into their head, "OMG! She was coming on to me!" If it took years to decipher, how strong and clear could it actually have been?
DaveC426913 said:So, when a girl I'd never met stopped me on my bike in front of her house to chat and said
"I have a joke. If I told you you had a great body, would you hold it against me? Ha ha."
.. I can take heart that she was probably not sending a very clear message?
My friend at school mentioned he knew her. Actually, that he Knew her. And so did half the gym class.zoobyshoe said:It depends on what you eventually figured out the message to be, Dave.
DaveC426913 said:My friend at school mentioned he knew her. Actually, that he Knew her. And so did half the gym class.
DaveC426913 said:So, when a girl I'd never met stopped me on my bike in front of her house to chat and said
"I have a joke. If I told you you had a great body, would you hold it against me? Ha ha."
.. I can take heart that she was probably not sending a very clear message?
theJorge551 said:I plan on progressing things just a little bit over the week, and hopefully by Friday I'll be at the stage where I can give her a small valentine's day gift and she'd expect it, more or less :P