Approaching Light Speed: Why Would It Fail?

jonatron5
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Ok Little background knowledge I am a huge scifi nerd I know some about modern physics mostly conceptual not mathematical The limit of my mathematics is the rocket equation. Anyway as most good ideas this one came to me in my sleep. I understand that the general convention is travel to the speed of light is impossible on the grounds that your essentially having to use proportionally more and more fuel for proportionally less and less acceleration and while I can't even remotely claim I understand the reasoning behind that I accept it as true.

my dream involved a society that had mastered the concept of subatomic particle physics and could manipulate matter and energy at will through massive expenditure of energy. They had a starship in space that they managed to open a small wormhole in front of with a gravitational attraction of 10m/s . the end of the wormhole being set up within the outer edges of the openings gravitational sphere of influence. The achieved effect was a constant acceleration as the acceleration grew more intense they would slowly move the ends of the wormholes closer and closer together. This gave to there projectile (ship in this case) velocity derived without expenditure of fuel. Now in the real world why would this not work?

Also upon waking I thought wouldn't it work better if they created a black hole infront of there craft at a fixed distance of say 100km out from the event horizon and they could create it such that it would have any amount of acceleration at any vector they chose. and could dissapate it at will.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a number of ways to get around the problem of carrying fuel, but none of them have anything to do with the issue you are facing.

The issue is that velocities don't actually add together in a 1+1=2 fashion, so no matter what acceleration you give your spaceship over any time (or forever), it still won't ever reach the speed of light. See here for more:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity-addition_formula
 
Wormholes probably can't exist. But if even if they can, they probably can't do what you say. The parts of the wormhole have mass (maybe negative?), and so they have momentum. Momentum is conserved, so accelerating your spaceship this way will require accelerating the wormhole somehow. Anyways, it's safe to say it's impossible.
 
jonatron5 said:
in the real world why would this not work?

Because you're assuming that wormholes can be created by "manipulating matter and energy". They can't. You would need exotic matter and energy, which nobody has ever observed, and which according to our best current theories can't exist.

jonatron5 said:
wouldn't it work better if they created a black hole infront of there craft at a fixed distance of say 100km out from the event horizon and they could create it such that it would have any amount of acceleration at any vector they chose. and could dissapate it at will.

This is a little better, since in principle you could create a black hole by "manipulating matter and energy". But having once created it, you can't dissipate it at will, and the only effect of creating it is going to be that the ship will fall into it. So this won't work either.
 
Even if you could dissipate a black hole, you still have conservation of momentum. The black hole has momentum. It has to go somewhere when you dissipate it.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top