I Approximate a plane E&M wave with this large sum....

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around approximating a plane electromagnetic wave using an infinite line of electric polarization along the z-axis, with polarization in the x-direction described by P(z,t) = pcos(kz-ωt). The concept involves a uniform density of these lines in space, all parallel and in phase. There is confusion regarding the nature of polarization being both on and perpendicular to the line, which is clarified by suggesting that at each point, a polarization vector exists perpendicular to the line. The idea is to conceptualize polarization as a product of charge and a very small distance, akin to string theory dimensions. The goal is to determine if this construction can effectively represent the electric and magnetic fields of a plane electromagnetic wave.
Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
419
I would like to approximate a plane electromagnetic wave with a very large sum of the following.

Let an infinite line, say the z axis, have a electric polarization on that line and perpendicular to that line, say the x direction to be specific given by,

P(z,t) = pcos(kz-ωt). The polarization is a function of both space and time. Now let there be a uniform density of such lines in all space all parallel to one another, all in phase, and with them all polarized in the x direction. Will such a construction approximate the electric and magnetic fields of plane E&M wave?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spinnor said:
I would like to approximate a plane electromagnetic wave with a very large sum of the following.

Let an infinite line, say the z axis, have a electric polarization on that line and perpendicular to that line, say the x direction to be specific given by,

P(z,t) = pcos(kz-ωt). The polarization is a function of both space and time. Now let there be a uniform density of such lines in all space all parallel to one another, all in phase, and with them all polarized in the x direction. Will such a construction approximate the electric and magnetic fields of plane E&M wave?

Thanks!
I just cannot understand the question. How can we have polarisation on that line and also perpendicular to it?
 
tech99 said:
I just cannot understand the question. How can we have polarisation on that line and also perpendicular to it?

Just imagine at each point of the line a polarization vector that is also perpendicular to the line. Polarization is charge times a distance, just imagine the distance is very small, as small as you wish with charge increased so that distance times charge is a constant. Let the distance be of order the string length in string theory, that is pretty damn small.

Sorry for the confusion.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top