Approximate spring potential energy U(x) for small oscillations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the potential energy function U(x) around an equilibrium point at x=0 using a Taylor expansion. It emphasizes that for small oscillations, the potential energy can be approximated by the simple harmonic oscillator (SHO) form, specifically U = 0.5kx^2. Participants express confusion about applying Taylor series expansions, particularly in calculating derivatives and understanding the significance of higher-order terms like x^4 compared to x^2. The conversation highlights the importance of mastering this concept, as it is foundational in physics. Understanding these principles is crucial for success in mechanics and related fields.
StationaryPanic
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


"Take a PE function U(x), which has an equilibrium point at x=0, and provides a restoring force in that region, and show that a Taylor expansion around that area can be approximated by a SHO PE function for small x."

Homework Equations


U=.5kx^2...x = (A^2)*sin^2(wo(t)-delta)
also typical taylor series expansion...MacLaurin expansion for x=0 i think?

The Attempt at a Solution


I've made several attempts...I don't think i have a general concept of how to proceed with this problem. Expansion of .5kx^-2 already ended up 0 + k*0 + k...integrating this k that remains twice gives kx^2 which aside from missing the .5 term seems to be validating our goal of the problem: showing that force and potential approximations both lead to the same basic form at small amplitudes. I just don't think I have any concept of how to expand a function using a series, which is sad considering I have already passed Mechanics II and am retaking for GPA reasons and shooting myself in the foot somewhat. Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you have a general potential ##U(x)##.
What is the Taylor series for such a function (the sum-expression)?

Next you use what's given, equilibrium means that the first derivative is 0.
Remember, you look at a small region around ##x=0##. What can you say about ##x^2## compared to ##x^4##?

Try to understand this assignment really well, it is common all around physics.
At least to get a feel for your system, this can help an awful lot.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top