Approximating arc length of Bezier by another Bezier

Reedbeta
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
(Note: cross posted to http://www.devmaster.net/forums/showthread.php?t=16227 )

Hey everyone,

As we know, the arc length of a cubic Bezier spline is kinda hard to calculate. There's no closed-form mathematical expression, so most people just subdivide it into a bunch of line segments and add those up. This is slow, but you can dress it up with adaptive subdivision and things like that to make it a bit faster.

I'd like to approximate the parameter-to-arc-length mapping of a Bezier with another Bezier. That is, given some 3D Bezier B(t) I'd like to compute a 1D Bezier s(t) that gives approximately the arc length of B from B(0) to B(t).

I could use the line segment method to get a bunch of "data points" on the arc length of B and then fit the 1D Bezier to it with least-squares or something. But I'm hoping (perhaps vainly) for a faster way...ideally something to compute the control points of s directly from the control points of B. I've googled around a bit but not found anything addressing this specific issue...anyone here happen to have heard of something like this before? :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Just to follow up, I did eventually find this paper which does a pretty good job of solving my problem.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top