B ARC Centre reports HF Gravitational Wave Antenna

Click For Summary
The publication titled "Rare Events Detected with a Bulk Acoustic Wave High Frequency Gravitational Wave Antenna" discusses a small piezo-electric device capable of detecting high-frequency gravitational waves and potentially dark matter particles. The device, which is less than 2 cm in size, requires a cryogenic environment for optimal functionality. There is a proposal to launch three satellites into orthogonal Earth orbits to enhance detection capabilities and determine the direction of dark matter particles. The discussion highlights that gravitational wave wavelengths from merger events are comparable to the system's size, suggesting that the source of these high-frequency waves is very small. The absence of a second parallel detector raises concerns about the reliability of the findings, as it could lead to confusion with background noise and varying influences on the detectors.
.Scott
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
3,822
Reaction score
1,876
The full title of the publication is:

Rare Events Detected with a Bulk Acoustic Wave High Frequency Gravitational Wave Antenna​

It is published in Physics Review Letters and reported in Phys Org.

They have created a small piezo-electric device (< 2cm, though it gets bigger once you create an appropriate cryogenic environment for it) that can be used to detect HF gravitational pulses - or perhaps dark matter particles.

Now I want them to create 3 satellites and put each into an Earth orbit orthogonal to the others. If they really can detect Dark Matter particles, this would allow us to determine what directions these particles are passing through us.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The size of the detector is not the wavelength they are sensitive to. They are sensitive at a few MHz, i.e. ~50 m wavelength.

Something happened, that much is clear from figure 4. It's unfortunate they don't have a second parallel detector. GW would excite both coherently, dark matter particles would only hit one, many background sources could influence the two detectors differently or show up in only one of them.
 
  • Like
Likes SBoh and berkeman
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...