Are Coefficients of Potential Non-Negative?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that coefficients of potential, denoted as Pij, are non-negative (Pij ≥ 0). The relationship between the potential on the ith conductor and the charges on conductors is expressed through the equation Phii = ∑ Pij Qj. It is noted that establishing this proof rigorously is challenging, as highlighted in Reitz and Milford. A suggestion is made to consider specific arrangements, such as grounding one conductor while applying charge to another, to derive results. The conversation emphasizes the importance of conductor spacing to minimize interaction effects on potential.
N2O2
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I want to prove that coefficients of potential are non-negative. i.e. Pij ≥ 0

Homework Equations



By coefficients of potential method we know that in a system of conductors the potential on ith conductor is related to charges on conductors by:

\Phii = \sum Pij Qj

The Attempt at a Solution



It is written in Reitz and Milford that it is hard to prove in a rigorous way. I think that we should use Pii ≥ Pij.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
how is the system arranged?
 
This is a general statement. Of course we should set a specific arrangement to obtain a result. for example put Qi on ith conductor and assume jth conductor to be grounded and Q on other conductors to be zero.
But I haven't found the correct conditions.
 
in your scenario, should the conductors be sufficiently a long way away, their potentials will not effect each other (to a certain approximation) hence defeating the equation connecting the potential of one to the charge of another.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top