Are Coherent Superposition Particles Considered Conservative Systems?

LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
356
Reaction score
33
Say we have a stream of particles, emitted from a source, traveling freely in one direction and then colliding with some sort of screen.

Between the source and the screen the particles are said to be in that indefinite state of limbo known as coherent superposition. Do the particles in this state, since they are not interacting with their environment (other particles), meet the definition of "conservative systems"?

Conversely, does EVERY exchange of energy (interacting with other particles) constitute a "measurement"?

As always, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, Are they (the particles in flight) interacting or not ?
DaTario
 
DaTario said:
Hi, Are they (the particles in flight) interacting or not ?



DaTario

The particles in flight are not interacting.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top