Are coordinate operators Hermitian?

Heisenberg
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I can't figure this one out given that the coordinate operator is continuous, it's hard to imagine "matrix elements". But presumably since the coordinates of the system (1d free particle) are always real valued, would this make the coordinate operator Hermitian?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Coordinate operators make most sense and are to be directly interpreted in the Schrödinger picture, where one builds a representation of the canonical commutation relation [x,p] =ihbar on a Hilbert space. One can show that on the maximal domain of definition, these operators are self-adjoint.
 
Sure - its the position operator.

But its not a matrix - it requires Rigged Hilbert Spaces and the Generalized Spectral Theorem to fully flesh out what's going on.

Be warned however the rigorous treatment of such is HARD.

Work your way up to it from Ballentine then a mathematically more orientated treatment like Hall - Quantum Theory For Mathematicians.

Thanks
Bill
 
Thanks for the feedback. I appreciate it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top