Are Electric Vehicle Batteries Being Deliberately Suppressed?

AI Thread Summary
Concerns about the suppression of electric vehicle battery technology are discussed, particularly regarding the ownership of NiMH battery patents by Chevron and the slow advancement of battery technology. The conversation highlights that while battery technology is being pursued aggressively, physical limits of electrochemistry and safety processing contribute to the high costs of lithium batteries. Improvements in battery safety have been made, but trade-offs often lead to increased expenses or compromised performance. The discussion suggests that significant advancements in electric and hydrogen storage will depend on economic motivations rather than ethical considerations. Overall, the focus remains on the need for financial incentives to drive further development in battery technology.
DavidUC
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I watched a movie called "Who Killed the Electric Car" and it raised a lot of suspicions although I know a few things were exaggerated and unfounded. They did bring up that Chevron owns the patent to NiMH batteries and will not allow them to be used for a voltage required for fully electric vehicles. As highly educated as you guys are, I was wondering what your thoughts are on the issue. Is battery technology being suppressed? Why haven't batteries advanced much? Why are lithium batteries so expensive? Is it really because the element itself is so expensive? Why haven't we improved their shortcomings (exploding, dead cells after few recharges, etc).

Can we expect electric and hydrogen storage to be a much higher priority in the near future?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
DavidUC said:
Is battery technology being suppressed? Why haven't batteries advanced much? Why are lithium batteries so expensive? Is it really because the element itself is so expensive? Why haven't we improved their shortcomings (exploding, dead cells after few recharges, etc).

Can we expect electric and hydrogen storage to be a much higher priority in the near future?

1. No, it's being pursued more aggessively than any other time in history.
2. Physical limits of electrochemistry. Look at the period table, lithium is the right answer and you see what they can do.
3. Processing for safety, pure lithium metal is dangerous so complicated processes are employed to use materials that intercalate the lithium, making it more expensive than the cost of elemental lithium.
4. They have improved greatly, particularly in regards to safety. In general though there are inevitable tradeoffs, the safer the battery is made either the more expensive it becomes or its performance is comprised in some important ways.
5. IMO, not until the cost of gasoline becomes prohibitive. We really aren't there yet. Business drives technology development not ethics. When the financial motivation is there it will happen. Stop worrying about it - that accomplishes nothing in any way.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top