Are escape-trajectory-only forces possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter inottoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the possibility that discrepancies in spacecraft trajectories, like the Earth flyby anomalies, could indicate new physics involving forces that activate only after an object reaches escape velocity. It raises questions about whether such forces would violate known laws of physics, particularly conservation laws. The Pioneer anomaly is mentioned as a related topic, with references to ongoing research that seeks to clarify the existence of anomalous acceleration signals after accounting for thermal recoil forces. The conversation emphasizes the need for further investigation into these anomalies to determine their implications. The potential for new physics in this context remains an open question.
inottoe
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Just suppose for a moment that various discrepancies in spacecraft trajectories, such as the Earth flyby anomalies, are due to new physics. It’s been pointed out in various sources, for example http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0608087" , that the spacecraft happen to be on hyperbolic trajectories when the anomalies occur. Further, suppose that this new physics involves forces that only act on an object once it reaches escape velocity from a gravitational source such as the sun or a planet.

The question is: Would such a force cause any obvious violations of the known laws of physics? For example, would it break any conservational laws?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
inottoe said:
Just suppose for a moment that various discrepancies in spacecraft trajectories, such as the Earth flyby anomalies, are due to new physics.
If you're talking about the Pioneer anomaly, you might want to read this: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=486509"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, nothing's definitive just yet. There's http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.2886" from a few days ago.
The main question is whether or not a statistically significant anomalous acceleration signal still remains in the residuals after the thermal recoil force has been properly accounted for. Results of this meticulous study will be published soon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top