Medical Are Fetuses Parasites? Requirements & Argument

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jooze
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the classification of fetuses in relation to parasites, with a focus on the biological and genetic implications. Participants argue that while fetuses may exhibit some characteristics of parasitism, they fundamentally differ from true parasites. A key point is that parasites typically aim to propagate their own genes at the expense of their host, whereas a fetus shares genetic material with its mother and contributes to the continuation of the mother's lineage. The conversation also touches on the physiological aspects of pregnancy, highlighting that fetuses rely on maternal resources without cannibalizing the mother, suggesting a more symbiotic relationship. Overall, the consensus leans towards the idea that fetuses do not meet the criteria to be classified as parasites due to their genetic kinship with the mother and the nature of their relationship.
Jooze
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What are the requirements to be a parasite? There is an argument suggesting that fetuses are considered parasites, since they leech nutrients from their host, in this case, their mother.

It feels like the obvious answer is that fetuses are not parasites, but I want to know why.

Thanks in advance.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Jooze said:
What are the requirements to be a parasite? There is an argument suggesting that fetuses are considered parasites, since they leech nutrients from their host, in this case, their mother.

It feels like the obvious answer is that fetuses are not parasites, but I want to know why.

Thanks in advance.

Welcome to the PF. Could you provide links to articles that take one position or the other? That would help us to not duplicate stuff that you already have read. What is the context of your question?
 
abortion rhetoric aside, fetal physiology is fairly well studied. My text (http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/bookdescription.cws_home/697456/description#description ) is at work, however IIRC the fetus takes Calcium from the mother; usually this presents no problem but loss of bone in the mother is a possibility:

http://www.endotext.org/pregnancy/pregnancy3/pregnancy3.htm

Maternal malnutrition results in a poorly developed fetus; the fetus does not cannibalize the mother.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
*waiting patiently for a joke about teenagers*
 
Math Is Hard said:
*waiting patiently for a joke about teenagers*

:smile:
 
It's definitely symbiotic in the long term in most cases.
 
Jooze said:
It feels like the obvious answer is that fetuses are not parasites, but I want to know why.

I think it is clear that fetuses are not parasites. This is not my field, so I can't be sure of the answer to the question, why. However, I suspect one reason relates to the issue of genetic reproduction. A true parasite is trying to pass on it's own genes and steals nutrients from a host, while a mother is trying to pass on its own genes. ... or, something like that, although I'm sure I'm not saying it correctly.
 
Last edited:
*waiting patiently for a joke about teenagers*

:smile:


While fetii may be functionally parasitic, I expect true parasitism disqualifies genetic kin from the equation, including only other species.

Alternately, if you consider the Selfish Gene (that we are merely vehicles for our genes to get around in), parasitism does not apply, since the gene's goal is to propogate itself, meaning the relationahip definitely works in favour of the gene attempting to get itself replicated.
 
Last edited:
Preliminary remarks:
1. Where is Jimmy Snyder? This thread is begging for one of his remarks.
2. If you have one, ask your pregnant wife whether fetuses are parasites. However, do watch out for flying objects and flying retorts when she blames you for ruining her body with your parasite.

Math Is Hard said:
*waiting patiently for a joke about teenagers*
Do jokes about 20-something parasites count?
 
Back
Top