Are fractals a dead-end area of maths?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nomadreid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Fractals
AI Thread Summary
Fractals are recognized for their aesthetic appeal and practical applications in estimating irregular shapes and self-similar scaling in various fields. Despite their vibrancy and ongoing research, the discussion questions whether fractals have led to the development of new independent mathematical fields, similar to how other mathematical concepts have evolved. While there are numerous papers being published, the focus remains on whether these studies yield significant theoretical advancements beyond fractals themselves. The potential for new applications, such as in the Riemann zeta function, is noted but remains unproven. Overall, the inquiry centers on the long-term mathematical impact of fractals.
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
243
This is not a high school question, but it seems to be too broad to fit in any of the other categories. Fractals are cute (nice pictures that can also be used to give better graphics, and also "shocking" that one can define a non-integer dimension), can be used to estimate lengths or volumes of irregular shapes (coastlines, Brownian motion or surfaces, fluid dynamics and all that), is a byword anytime anyone finds some self-similar scaling (everything from galaxies to quasi-crystals), and so forth. But do they lead to any other new mathematics? For example, the motion and logical paradoxes are also "cute", but they led to whole new and fruitful fields of mathematics being born. But, for example, are Hausdorff dimensions good for anything besides fractals? Is the study of fractals good only for itself?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thanks, jedishrfu. Interesting papers in this link. That fractals are a vibrant field means mostly that new results in the field arise, or that one finds new applications (or hopes for new ones: Professor Lapidus has been trying for years to see if a fractal approach to the Riemann zeta function will bear fruit.) The question was however whether there has grown out of the study of fractals any new fields that then operate as independent fields of study: for example, Pascal's work on probability led to today's measure theory, Lebesgue integration, etc. That is, any "spin-offs". I shall be going through the 117 papers on that arxiv link, though, and perhaps I will find my answer. So thanks again.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top