Are gamma rays produced in fusion reactions?

MnemosyneAH
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Lots of articles and papers I read talk about the gamma rays produced during fusion reactions. And yet, when I look at equations for fuel cycles, the sum of the energies of the fusion products equals the total energy liberated.

Since this implies that all of the energy released in the fusion reaction is in the form of kinetic energy carried by the reaction products, where do gamma rays fit in? Are they produced afterward, as syncrotron or bremsstrahlung radiation?

Either way, does anyone know how much energy is carried as gamma rays for various fuel cycles, or can point me to a website that does? I'm especially interested in the 3He-3He cycle.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gamma emission occurs in the reaction: p + d -> He3 + γ

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/astro/procyc.html


The distinction between gamma rays and X-rays is somewhat arbitrary, since a 100 keV gamma is the same as a 100 keV X-ray. The distinction is related to the origin. X-rays are generally defined at those photons originating from atomic reactions, i.e. transitions from atomic electrons, with photon energies above ultraviolet. Brehmstrahlung (braking radiation) originates from free electrons accelerating in a nuclear electric field. Synchrotron radiation is probably distinguished from gamma radiation since it is usually originating from an accelerated proton or light nucleus.

Gamma emission occurs in the (p,γ) reactions of the CNO cycle.
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/energy/cno.html
 
So what you're saying is, aside from a few reactions, and discounting synchrotron and braking radiation, the equations are right and the energy generally is carried as kinetic energy?

The sources I read must have been referring to bremsstrahlung x-rays. That explains why I wasn't able to find any better data on these fusion gamma rays.

This actually makes it easier for me, since I'm self-teaching myself nuclear
physics, and this is one less channel to keep in mind.
 
Last edited:
In the fusion of light elements, the reactions involve a restructuring the nuclei, and in general the resulting energy is 'carried as kinetic energy'.

Usually a confined plasma implies a magnetic field (as opposed to inertial confinement), and the motion of electrons about the field lines produces 'cyclotron radiation'.

http://casa.colorado.edu/~wcash/APS3730/chapter5.pdf

http://casa.colorado.edu/~wcash/APS3730/textbook.htm

Brehmsstrahlung radiation is also possible and occurs when free electrons are accelerated by nuclear charges (protons and nuclei).

FYI - http://casa.colorado.edu/~wcash/APS3730/notes.htm


Gamma rays are more likely when fusion involves nuclei heavier than B, e.g., C, N, O. Of course, if free neutrons are present, they can be absorbed in (n, γ) reactions.
 
Last edited:
I think it's not so difficult to calculate the energy fraction that is carried away by a gamma ray photon. If one takes the mean energy of p and d in the sun (based on the temperature) and uses the masses of p, d and He3 one can calculate the energy of the gamma ray photon.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
53
Views
10K
Back
Top