Are Magnetic Monopoles Related to the Relativistic Effect of Magnetism?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of magnetic monopoles and their relationship to magnetism as a relativistic effect. It posits that the non-existence of magnetic monopoles is an empirical fact rather than a prediction of classical electromagnetic theory. The participants argue that if magnetic monopoles do not exist, then magnetism can be viewed as a relativistic effect. Conversely, if monopoles were to exist, magnetic fields would not be considered relativistic effects. The conclusion drawn is that the two statements about monopoles and magnetism are interconnected, suggesting a deeper relationship in electromagnetic theory.
QuArK21343
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Is the non-existence of magnetic monopoles a fact that can be predicted from classical electromagnetic theory or is it just an empirical fact that Maxwell simply added to his set of equations? Second question: is there any relation between this two facts:

1. There are no magnetic monopoles

2. Magnetism is just a relativistic effect
 
Physics news on Phys.org
QuArK21343 said:
Is the non-existence of magnetic monopoles a fact that can be predicted from classical electromagnetic theory or is it just an empirical fact that Maxwell simply added to his set of equations?

Empirical fact. No mathematical paradox appears if you allow for magnetic monopoles in those equations.

Second question: is there any relation between this two facts:

1. There are no magnetic monopoles

2. Magnetism is just a relativistic effect

Yeah, I think that those statements go hand in hand. Either both are correct, or none:

If there are no magnetic monopoles, as we are assuming in physics at the moment, we know that magnetism can be considered as a relativistic effect.

And if there are mag. monopoles, we can see that magnetic fields cannot be transformed away by Lorentz-boosts, for the same reason that electric fields are not relativistic effects in the currently established theory. So in that case the mag. field is not a relativistic effect.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top