Are Multiple Stereoisomers Produced in Hydroxylation Reactions of Alkenes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the reactions of cis-1-phenyl-but-1-ene and trans-1-phenyl-but-1-ene with osmium tetroxide and aqueous sodium bisulfite. It is confirmed that the first reaction can yield both enantiomers due to the creation of a stereogenic center, as osmium can attack from either face of the alkene. For the second reaction, there is clarification that osmium tetroxide produces syn-diol products, which may not result in chirality unless the olefin is terminal. The conversation also highlights the importance of understanding stereochemistry in these reactions, noting that the "syn" terminology can be misleading in straight-chain cases. The participants emphasize the role of the osmate ester and the flexibility of the C-C bond after the reaction, which can lead to various product conformations.
maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi

I need some help with the following reactions:

1. cis-1-phenyl-but-1-ene + osmium textroxide + aq sodium bisulfite
2. trans-1-phenyl-but-1-ene + osmium tetroxide + aq sodium bisulfite

To make things simpler, I am attaching a diagram which includes my solution. Reaction 2 is clear to me but I think another product should be formed in the first reaction according to the principle that if a stereogenic center is created in a reaction, all configurations about it are formed. Is this reasoning correct?

Thanks for your help.

Cheers
Vivek
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Yes, your reasoning is correct. The product that you have drawn would come from the osmium attacking the top face of the alkene as you have it drawn. The enantiomer of the product you have drawn could be formed by the osmium attacking the bottom face of the cis compound you have drawn.
 
Dear friends,

I am not sure about reaction two, as osmium tetroxide (in the presence of an oxidizing agent such as sodium bisulfite) always produces syn- type of compounds, I mean, trans-alkenes with bulky groups will even give syn- diols; so there will not be any chiral compound except that the olefin is located at the terminal. In that case, a vicinal diol is produced with one chiral carbon.

Please view my figure in the attachment, taken from Francis Carey's Organic Chemistry, 1987, ISBN: 0-07-009831-X, from pages 570 and 571.

By the way, your reasoning is true about stereogenic centers, Vivek. Movies is right also, about attacking topwards and bottomwards through an alkene; however, I'm not sure if it is valid for osmium tetroxide as it forms a complex compound.

Regards,
chem_tr
 
The "syn" terminology tends to fail in straight chain cases because it is dependent on how the compound is drawn. Maverick's picture shows the products in Newman projections, where the horizontal groups are, by convention, protruding out of the plane of the page. I think that if you inspect the image again carefully with this in mind you will find that the image is of the correct racemic product from the trans olefin. Indeed the transition state is as you described, chem_tr, and the initial osmate ester does exist with both oxygens on the same side of the olefin. However, once the osmate ester is cleaved the C-C bond between the hydroxyls can rotate freely and attain a conformation like Maverick drew.
 
Thanks again chem_tr and movies for all your help.

Cheers
Vivek
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top