Are My Redox Calculations Correct?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a redox reaction involving iron wire and sulfuric acid, producing ferrous sulfate and hydrogen gas. The participant details their calculations for determining the moles of potassium manganate used in titration, leading to the calculation of moles of Fe2+ and ultimately the mass and purity of the iron sample. They arrive at a purity percentage of 100.31%, raising concerns about the accuracy of their calculations. The participant expresses uncertainty about the correctness of their results, particularly regarding significant figures. The calculations appear correct, but the participant plans to revisit significant figures for precision.
PBimages
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



0.9966g of Iron Wire was used...

Iron Wire was placed in 200cm3 of 1m Sulphuric Acid, this was heated and the hydrogen gas vented off...

Producing...

Fe + H2SO4 = FeSO4 + H2

Fe = Iron
H2SO4 = Sulphuric Acid
FeSO4 = Ferrous Sulphate
H2 = Hydrogen

This produced a Ferrous Sulphate solution, as shown above by the balanced equation...

This was then filtered and made upto 250cm3 using 2M sulphuric Acid, to stop air oxidation effecting the solution...

25cm3 aliquots of this solution were then titrated against 0.02M of Potassium Manganate (VII)

This produced an average titre of 17.9cm3

Homework Equations



Work out the number of Moles of Manganate (VII) in your mean titre...

Using the equations given, work out the moles of Fe2+ used in 25cm3 aliquots

MnO4- (aq) + 8H+(aq) + 5e- = 4H2O(I) + Mn2+ (aq) Fe2+(aq) = Fe3+(aq) + e-

Work out the number of moles present in 250cm3...

Work out the mass in grams of iron in the sample...

Work out the purity of the sample...

The Attempt at a Solution



To Balance the equation...

Reduction

MnO4- (aq) = Mn2+

MnO4- (aq) + 8H+ (aq) = Mn2+ (aq) + 4H2O (I)

MnO4- (aq) + 8H+ (aq) + 5e- = Mn2+ (aq) + 4H2O (I)

Oxidation

Fe2+ (aq) = Fe3+ (aq) + e-

To Balance the equation, the first half of the reaction needs to be multiplied by five, then the equations can be added together.

MnO4- (aq) + 8H+ (aq) + 5e- = Mn2+ (aq) + 4H2O (I)

Fe2+ (aq) = Fe3+ (aq) + 5e-

MnO4- (aq) + 8H+ (aq) + 5e- + 5Fe2+ (aq) = Mn2+ (aq) + 4H2O (I) + 5Fe3+ (aq) + 5e-

The overall redox balanced equation is therefore: -

MnO4- (aq) + 8H+ (aq) + 5Fe2+(aq) = Mn2+ (aq) + 4H2O(I) + 5Fe3+(aq)

The rest of the calculations follow...

To calculate the number of moles of MnO4- used: -

The volume is converted from cm3 into dm-3

17.9cm3/1000 = 0.0179dm3

The number of moles of MnO4- used was: -

Moles of MnO4-= Molarity x Volume (dm3)

Moles of MnO4-= 0.02 x 0.0179 = 3.58 x10-4

So the total amount of manganate (VII) in the Titre is 3.58 x 10-4 mol

MnO4- (aq) + 8H+ (aq) + 5Fe2+ (aq) = Mn2+ + 4H2O (I) + 5Fe3+ (aq)

The balanced equation shows that a ratio of 1: 5 exists between the MnO4- and Fe2+.

Therefore: -

To work out the number of moles of Fe2+ in 25cm3:-

Moles of Fe2+ = Moles of MnO4- x Ratio

Moles of Fe2+ = 3.58x 10-4 x 5 =1.79x 10-3

The number of moles of Fe2+ in 250cm3

1.79 x 10-3 x 10 = 0.0179

The total mass of iron in grams is: -

Mass(g)= Moles of Fe2+ x RAM Fe2+

Mass(g)= 0.0179 x 55.85 = 0.999715

The percentage of purity is: -

Purity= (Moles of Fe2+ x RAM Fe2+) / Weight of iron wire

Purity=(0.0179 x 55.85)/0.9966 = 1.0031256

The total percentage is: -

1.0031256 x 100 = 100.31256

Therefore the total percentage of purity is: 100.31
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calculations seem OK. Think about significant figures.
 
Thanks Borek,

I'll sort out the Significant Figures later...

My main concern is the calculations...

For some reason something is telling me that the calculations are wrong...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top