Are 'power', 'index' and 'exponent' exact synonyms

AI Thread Summary
The terms "power," "index," and "exponent" are related but not exact synonyms; "exponent" is more formal, while "index" is used differently in British and American contexts. "Exponential growth" specifically refers to functions of the form a^x, while x^a represents polynomial, rational, radical, or transcendental functions depending on the value of a. The operation of raising a number to another is called exponentiation, and it can be used generally, not just for e or specific bases. In modeling, functions like f(x) = Cx^a are referred to as power laws. The distinctions clarify the terminology used in mathematics.
Aeneas
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Can you please help me sort out my terminology?

Are 'power', 'index' and 'exponent' exact synonyms, even thogh they tend to be used in different contexts? If a^x gives 'exponential growth' is the growth described by x^a also properly called 'exponential'? If not, what is it called?

Thanks,

Aeneas
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


I would consider "power" and "exponent" to be basically the same- "exponent" being a little more formal than "power". Our British friends use "index" to mean "exponent" but we Americans do not. To us an "index" is simply a "label" (as on a vector or tensor) and can be either a superscript of a subscript.

"Exponential growth" on the other hand refers to the "exponential function", ex or variations on that such as ax= ex ln(a). Something like xa is a "polynomial function" if a is a positive integer, a "rational function" if a is a negative integer, a "radical function" if a is a fraction, and a "transcendental function" if a is irrational.
 


Note:

Often, in modelling, to utilize a function:
f(x)=Cx^{a}
is called to use a "power law". (C, a constants to be empirically determined).
 


Yes that's the way I refer to them.

f(x) = a^x : an exponential.

f(x) = x^a : a power (of x).
 


Thanks for those replies. Can you use "exponentiation" as a noun, to go with "addition" and "multiplication" for example, to generally describe the general process of raising one number to the power of another, then, or should it be reserved for raising e or some other number to the power of x?

Also, the phrase "exponential growth" is a common one, but what would you put in the bracket in "( ) growth" if the growth was described by, say, a polynomial function?
 


These are the distinctions as I know them:

A "power" is an operation also known as exponentiation, as in the third power of 2 is 8.

The "exponent" is the argument in the superscript of a power - then n in an. It is also the "index" of the power in the same way as n is the index of the radical \sqrt[n]{a}.

For a constant:

f(x) = a^x is an exponential function.

g(x) = x^a is a power function.

I hope this helps.

--Elucidus
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top