Are Results from Inelastic Particle Collisions Reproducible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Illusionology
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inelastic Particle
Illusionology
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
with this technique that has been used to detect quarks, are the results reproducable every time? or are there different results which indicate the hadron has quarks that move inside?
with rutherfords scattering, generally every 8000 alpha particles deflect in random directions. these results can be predicted + reproduced. Is it the same with inelastic particle collision experiments? I am thinking it has to be right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


is this an accurate picture of the inside of the atom when the electron scattering results are taken into account?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In Fig. 1.3, QCD theory predicts the shape of each curve, but not the magnitude, which is fit to the experiments.
 
Illusionology said:


is this an accurate picture of the inside of the atom when the electron scattering results are taken into account?


This URL refers to a "gluon" video.

The atomic youtube URL is the following: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bQQPK-QaHI&feature=channel

The answer to your question is NO, it is not the right picture of the inside of an atom.
First of all, the negative charge cloud "fluctuates" instead of being a standing wave pulsation. Secondly, the incident electron does not sufficiently approach the positive charge cloud in this video, so such a scattering is probably the elastic Rutherford one, without exciting the atom by transferring a sufficiently large momentum to the nucleus.

You can find the positive charge atomic form-factors and curves in my popular article "Atom as a "Dressed" Nucleus", (http://arxiv.org/abs/0806.2635), I attach it to my letter. There you will find the right atomic form-factors as well as the deep inelastic atomic cross sections.

Bob.
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
The original experiments were done by Jerry Friedman (MIT), Henry Kendall (MIT), and Richard Taylor (SLAC) (And Marty Breidenbach, student) circa 1970 using inelastic scattering of electrons (I think 40 GeV) on a liquid hydrogen target with a big spectrometer to measure both the scattering angle and the energy loss.
 
Last edited:
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top