Are Stars Closer Than We Think?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Z03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
Z03
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I just wanted to ask, if we are able to slow light particles by freezing the protons then would it be possible that stars are actually a lot closer to the Earth than we think since outer space is a cold vacuum, then light traveling from the stars would be slow, but every time this light travels next to another star the light would speed up and bend around the star and propel itself and then slow down again. Is it possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, not really. The speed of light through a material has been altered in laboratory experiments, but light from stars is coming to us through a vacuum. There just isn't any material to be chilled by the cold of space and slow the photons.
 
That is true, but space isn’t really empty. there is space dust and rocks floating in space that are at extreme cold temperatures and light sometimes has to travel around these huge bodies of mass, so is it possible that these huge bodies of mass affect light ?
 
Z03 said:
That is true, but space isn’t really empty. there is space dust and rocks floating in space that are at extreme cold temperatures and light sometimes has to travel around these huge bodies of mass, so is it possible that these huge bodies of mass affect light ?

Think carefully. Even through AIR, the speed of light is barely different than the "vacuum" value. So by how much do you think light will be slowed down traveling in the almost empty region in space?

I work with ultra high vacuum systems all the time, which is still considerably higher than the vacuum in space. We'd win a lot of prizes if we can detect a difference in the speed of light with varying vacuum at that level.

In any case, your original premise of 'cold vacuum' being equated as freezing light is faulty. The "temperature" of the medium ISN'T what is meant by "freezing light". You really ought to read the actual report before jumping off on a tangent onto such catch phrases.

Zz.
 
Last edited:
Z03 said:
... light traveling from the stars would be slow, but every time this light travels next to another star the light would speed up and bend around the star and propel itself and then slow down again. Is it possible?
Also, be sure to double check your own logic. If light were to speed up near a 'warm' star it would bend away from the star not around. That light bends around the sun and stars is why we know it effectively goes slower the nearer to a larger mass it gets. Also shown by the Shapiro Effect.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top