Are the cone and sphere intersecting correctly in my code?

chrom68
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I am looking to test detect if a cone (described by an apex, angle theta and axis) and a sphere (defined by a sphere centre and a radius) intersect.

Please see here for a complete description (because i can't post the code here):

http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=513868

I am having trouble doing a simple test using this algorithm at the bottom of the link, which brings into question either the code or the validity of the math principles used. Intersections and Misses of the cone and sphere detections aren't consistent. Any advice on what is wrong with the math or the code?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I've narrowed down the problem to looking for the closest point on the cone, to the sphere's centre (most likely a perpendicular distance away). The sphere's centre could be inside or outside the cone, hence the radius is the key to knowing whether there is an intersection or not. I've performed a test which allows me to do this, so now i need some help on getting the closest point.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top