Are the doppler effects of sound wave and light wave of different roots?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that the light Doppler effect is not solely a relativistic phenomenon but also has classical roots. It emphasizes that when considering the classical limit, the light Doppler effect can be understood through Huygens' principle, leading to a frequency shift analogous to that of sound waves. The relativistic Doppler effect incorporates time dilation, resulting in the frequency observed by a receiver differing from that emitted by the source. This relationship is mathematically expressed as the classical Doppler effect multiplied by the time dilation factor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Huygens' principle
  • Familiarity with the concept of time dilation
  • Knowledge of classical and relativistic Doppler effects
  • Basic grasp of wave mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of the classical Doppler effect
  • Study the implications of time dilation in special relativity
  • Explore Huygens' principle in wave propagation
  • Investigate the differences between sound and light wave behavior
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of physics, and anyone interested in the principles of wave mechanics and the effects of relativity on wave phenomena.

wdlang
Messages
306
Reaction score
0
is the light doppler effect a purely relativistic effect?

or it is present even in the classical limit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Treated as a Huygens wave, there ought to be classical frequency shift, which should be the limit of the relativistic effect when v << c.
 
wdlang said:
is the light doppler effect a purely relativistic effect?

or it is present even in the classical limit?
The light Doppler effect is basically just like the classical one but with the added complication that the source's clock is running slow in the frame of the receiver, so the frequency at which the source is emitting pulses/peaks in its own frame is different from the frequency at which the source is emitting pulses/peaks in the receiver's frame. See my post #15 here (along with #18 on the same thread) for a derivation of the fact that relativistic Doppler is just classical Doppler multiplied by the time dilation factor.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K