Are the electron flow in a conductor and ion flow in electrolyte same?

AI Thread Summary
Current flow in conductors is due to the movement of electrons, while in electrolytes, it is the movement of ions that constitutes current. Despite the different charge carriers, both scenarios can be analyzed using the same principles of electric current, as described by Kirchhoff's First Law, which states that charge conservation must hold at connections. The conventional understanding of current does not change based on the type of charge carrier, as a positive charge moving in one direction is equivalent to a negative charge moving in the opposite direction. While some debate the direction of current flow, the established conventions remain effective in practical applications. Understanding both electron flow and conventional current can simplify circuit analysis without leading to confusion.
shiraztk
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
A current flow occurs when there is movement of electron in a conductor. But in a electrolyte its the ions that move and we still say there is current flow.

Are the electron flow in a conductor and ion flow in a electrolyte is the same?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could include a bath of electrolyte in a circuit and measure electric current in the wires - and that current would have to be flowing through the bath. Clearly, at the wire / electrode connection, there must be the same number of charges join in and out (Kirchoff's First Law)
In electrical theory we just use the word Current to describe the effect of Charge flow. A positive charge flowing in one direction is indistinguishable from a negative charge flowing in the other direction - in most respects. If you are talking about electrolysis, of course, the result may be different.

Many people winge and say that 'they got it wrong about the direction of current'. The very fact that we get along fine with negative electrons and the conventional direction of current can reassure you that there is no problem and no 'paradox', 'disagreement', 'cockup'. Forget about electron flow when you are dealing with circuits and you will not go wrong. Try to accommodate the electron flow and conventional current within the same argument and you are bound to fall flat on your face one day! Particles don't always help us in Science.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top