Are There 706 Potential Exoplanets in the Latest Kepler Mission Release?

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exoplanet
AI Thread Summary
The Kepler Mission's June 2010 data release identified 706 potential exoplanet candidates among approximately 156,000 stars, including five multi-planet systems. The candidates range in size from Earth-like to Jupiter-sized, significantly impacting exoplanet population statistics. With the transit method missing about 85% of planetary systems, even a small confirmation rate could nearly double the known exoplanet count. The remaining 400 targets with potential candidates are expected to be released in February 2011. The transparency of the data release has been praised, highlighting a commendable effort in sharing scientific information.
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.2799

"On 15 June 2010 the Kepler Mission released data on all but 400 of the ~156,000 planetary target stars to the public. At the time of this publication, 706 targets from this first data set have viable exoplanet candidates with sizes as small as that of the Earth to larger than that of Jupiter. Here we give the identity and characteristics of 306 of the 706 targets. The released targets include 5 candidate multi-planet systems. Data for the remaining 400 targets with planetary candidates will be released in February 2011."
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
700 !

IIRC, the transit method misses ~85% of planetary systems so, even if only ~10% of that 700 are confirmed, this finding has a huge impact on the exoplanet population statistics.
 
"This is exciting news, because even if only half of the possibilities pan out as exoplanets (as the Kepler team expects) the results would still almost double the count of known planets."

Here is the notice they are releasing potential extrasolar planetary data [1st link] and the press release saying that it's data on 156,000 stars [2]. You can search the data [3] or just download the tarfiles [4] via anonymous FTP:
http://archive.stsci.edu/mast_news.php?out=html&desc=t&id=362
http://kepler.nasa.gov/news/nasakeplernews/index.cfm?FuseAction=ShowNews&NewsID=42
http://archive.stsci.edu/kepler/data_search/search.php
http://archive.stsci.edu/pub/kepler/lightcurves/tarfiles/

to access the ftp:
ftp archive.stsci.edu
cd /pub/kepler/lightcurves/tarfiles

If you do a search there appears to be anywhere from half to two thirds of the data that are marked as proprietary data which their search help gives a brief explanation of:

Clicking on entries in this column will mark the entry for retrieval. To mark all entries, click one of the buttons labelled 'Mark All','Mark public', or 'Mark Proprietary'. (Unmarking all entries can be done the same way using the appropriate button.) For missions with proprietary data, the mark button element will have a yellow background and a '@' symbol to indicate data sets not yet public.

I think the majority of those that are unreleased are simply Q2 data or later since this data is just from the first 42 days of the mission. What's available as the tar file appears to be all Q0 and Q1 data so I'm not certain if the 400 that are 'censored' are included in that or not. If they are withheld it seems odd that the announcement, release notes and README file make no mention of this. Still, we're talking 12+ GB of compressed data here.

Overall and despite the reported censoring of the best candidates, I personally applaud their transparency here that surpasses anything another government related organization (or even scientific field for that matter) exhibits. Alright, maybe CERN or the LHC will be as transparent or more transparent but this is still pretty impressive.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top