Are there any in demand graduate field of physics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the prospects of graduate programs for physics students, particularly those with lower undergraduate marks. Participants explore various fields, including nuclear engineering and accelerator physics, and consider the implications of academic performance on graduate school admissions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about their academic performance and questions whether there are graduate programs that might overlook lower marks, suggesting a potential interest in fields that are less competitive.
  • Another participant suggests that engineering programs, particularly in applied physics, could be a viable option and that the individual might excel in such a field.
  • A different viewpoint asserts that graduate schools do not have extra spots to fill, emphasizing the competitive nature of admissions and the high number of applicants relative to available positions.
  • One participant advocates for nuclear engineering, noting the availability of grants and fellowships, and suggests that success on the GRE could mitigate concerns about undergraduate marks.
  • Another participant cautions that if a student struggles in undergraduate studies, they may find graduate school equally challenging, stressing the importance of personal interest in the chosen field.
  • A suggestion is made to consider accelerator and beam physics as a potential area of focus.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the availability of graduate spots and the impact of undergraduate performance on admissions. There is no consensus on the best path forward for students with lower marks, with multiple competing perspectives on suitable fields and the challenges of graduate school.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of personal interest in selecting a graduate program and the potential difficulties of transitioning to a new field. There are unresolved assumptions regarding the competitiveness of various programs and the specific requirements for admissions.

zheng89120
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
So, I am going into my final year of a physics degree in a pretty reputable university, and some of my former marks were not up to the 3.0 standard (EDIT: a lot of my former marks were not nearly up to the 3.0 standard), although I am hoping that my last year marks, if I choose to go into it, would be at or above the standard.

My question is are there types of graduate programs that would look past the marks, simply because they need graduate spots to fill? This doesn't even have to be in physics, could be a type of graduate program that would accepts physics applicants.

I know physics isn't like nursing, but I was actually considering switching out of physics (to nuclear engineering), because in my current situation, I am far from guaranteed to any graduate schools, unless they have some spots they need to fill. Maybe not, but perhaps there are a few areas of physics which most people shun from?

P.S. I am also hoping to get accepted to do a thesis course, not sure that would make a big difference.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can probably be fine or ahead if you go into a graduate engineering program. Engineering is basically applied physics, so I think you would excel. You could also try and get a job as an engineer, I would suspect you would be qualified.

Just don't go to graduate school for comparative religion and wonder why you can't find a job haha.
 
No, graduate schools do not have extra spots to fill. I attended two lower ranked physics programs (which still had students go on to top postdocs and get tenure-track faculty positions at good schools) which still turned down about 90% of applicants. Grad schools are not desperate for students. There are more trying to go to grad school than there are spots for them.
 
Nuclear engineering is the route to go. There's a lot of grants and fellowships coming from the federal government. It doesn't help that you have lower marks but if you do alright on the GREs you should be okay. Honestly, I think courses in nuclear engineering are easier than those in physics so I don't think you would have trouble. The more challenging part is doing the research and applying your physics to the nuclear engineering field. I would go down that route though.
 
Something you may also want to consider is what you're expecting from graduate school itself. If you're struggling and having a hard time getting getting over a 3 in undergrad, you're not likely going to find graduate school any easier. You'll be in an even worse situation if you make a selection based on the ease of getting into the field rather than personal interest because it is tremendously difficult to make progress and maintain motivation on a project you don't care about.
 
Look into Accelerator and Beam physics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K