Are there any standout books on Set Theory and what research is left to be done?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion highlights notable books on Set Theory, specifically recommending "Set Theory and Logic" by Stoll and "The Joy of Sets" (2nd Edition) by Keith Devlin. The latter is praised for its clear explanations of Zermelo's axioms and the independence of 2^{\aleph_{0}} = \aleph_{1} from ZFC. Participants confirm that Set Theory is not a fully exhausted field, referencing the "Handbook of Set Theory" as a resource for ongoing research opportunities. Additionally, Jech's and Hrbacek's introductory texts are suggested as foundational readings before advancing to Jech's more complex set theory work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZFC)
  • Familiarity with ordinals and cardinality concepts
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical logic
  • Experience with reading mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore "Set Theory" by Thomas Jech for advanced concepts
  • Research the "Handbook of Set Theory" for current research topics
  • Study the independence of mathematical statements from ZFC
  • Read "Set Theory and Logic" by Robert R. Stoll for foundational understanding
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of mathematics, and researchers interested in Set Theory and its applications will benefit from this discussion.

andytoh
Messages
357
Reaction score
3
Any books that really stand out? Currently, I'm reading "Set Theory and Logic" by Stoll. I'm not interested in the axiomatic type of set theory, like Godel's theory and all those unreadable symboic proofs. I'm more interested in stuff like the axiom of choice proofs and such. Also, is there any research left to do in set theory or is it a fully exhausted field?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know about others, but I quite enjoyed Keith Devlin's "The Joy of Sets" (2nd Edition is much better). It gives a good justification of each of Zermelo's axioms and why they are there and has a very good explanation of the ordinals.
However the unique feature of this book is that it contains a good beginner's explanation of why 2^{\aleph_{0}} = \aleph_{1} is independent of ZFC and the attempts to resolve this by the addition of new axioms.
 
well there are plenty of good intro books on set theory.
At my school we're using jech and hrbaceck intro to set theory, after reading this intro I think the next step is reading jech's set theory text, which is more advanced.

As for research in the field, if you search for handbook of set theory in google you'll find a page with the articles from the handbook, they address there their research in the field, so yes there's research in the field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 132 ·
5
Replies
132
Views
20K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K