Are There Criteria for Proving Co-Primes of Vectors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phynewb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
phynewb
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi guys

I have a question about the coprime of two vectors
For two vectors (x1,x2) and (y1,y2).
Given a,b with gcf (a,b)=1 .i.e. relatively prime.
I do the linear combination of two vectors
a(x1,x2)+b(y1,y2)=n(z1,z2) with some common factor n and gcf(z1,z2)=1.
If n=1 for any a,b, two vectors are said co-prime.
I wonder if any criteria to prove two vectors are coprime.
For example, (2,3),(1,3) are not coprime b/c (2,3)+(1,3)=3(1,2).
But (7,3),(2,1) are coprime b/c a(7,3)+b(2,1)=(7a+2b,3a+b) and gcf(7a+2b,3a+b)=gcf(a,3a+b)=gcf(a,b)=1.
Also how to generalize it to vectors with n components?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, I havnt checked the details, but such problems screem for the use of the determinant formed by the x's and y's, and can then also be generalized immediately. I guess the condition is that this determinant has no prime factors, that is being 1 or -1. Any prime factor p would allow a nontrivial relation ax+by=0 over F_p, which then lifts to show a relation with gcd(z_1,z_2)=p. Tell me if that works out.
 
Thanks Norwegian!
I think you are almost right. But (4,-3) and (3,-4) are coprime but with det=7 will be a counter example. If we consider higher dimensions, are (2,-1,2,-1) and (-4,1,4,-1) co-prime? Do you know how to show it rigorously?
 
(4,-3) + (3,-4) is divisible by 7, so they are not coprime. The sum of your other vectors is divisible by 2, so they are also not coprime. My guesses for generalizations: n vectors in n-space, determinant = 1 or -1. Two vectors in n-space, set of all 2x2 minors coprime, m<n vectors in n-space, all mxm minors coprime.
 
I type the wrong vectors. I consider the two (-1,0,3,-1) and (-3,1,1,0). Are they coprime? I think you are right but I do not know how to prove it. Thank you!
 
Yes, those vectors are coprime. You only need to look at the last two components.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top