Other Are there guides for assigning problem difficulty levels in ME textbooks?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frabjous
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difficulty
AI Thread Summary
There is a lack of resources that categorize problem difficulty levels in freshman mechanical engineering textbooks, which often contain over 100 problems per chapter. Typically, the problems are structured with the first third being easy, the next medium, and the last third hard, with a few very challenging ones. Professors often select problems based on varying difficulty to ensure a balanced assignment. Undergraduate textbooks, especially in electrical engineering, tend to include many drill-like problems, while graduate-level texts focus on fewer, more complex problems that require advanced techniques. Understanding the author's intent and the problem structure is crucial for effective problem selection and practice.
Frabjous
Gold Member
Messages
1,952
Reaction score
2,381
I was recently looking at some freshman ME textbooks that had over 100 problems per chapter. Are there resources that identify the difficulty level for each individual problem (for example: easy, medium, hard, fiendish) for the common textbooks? I am not looking for solution manuals.

Another way of viewing it, are there guides on which problems to assign?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Likely not, the usual scheme is to assume the first third are easy, the next medium and the last third hard with the last few very hard.

You'll see this when profs pick problems to solve where they'll say do 5,7,9 and then do 23,25,27 and 43 or something like that so you know they picked them by varying difficulty levels.
 
Maybe the preface of the textbook will tell you the strategy the author has in mind for presenting so many problems. I note at the the undergrad level for example EE. chapters contain many "drill" like problems and the reader is expected to solve a great number of them (especially with circuits and ohm's law (mesh and node voltage techniques)). However, without knowing the book, I would hate to say, solve > 70 of them, when they all may be brain breakers On the other hand, I would hate to say solve 10 of them, when more may be needed to develop enough practice.

Most graduate level books present problems that are less drill like or pedestrian and involve more and more ingenious techniques, and consequently there are fewer of them. Ten Jackson Classical Electrodynamics may be as time cosuming, as 50 Ohm's law node voltage problems. Also the aims of the authors; Jackson to develop technique; the other to develop practice; may be different
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and Frabjous
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top