Are Thermal States Always Mixed States?

camipol89
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,
I was reading about thermal states and now I have a doubt: is a thermal state always a mixed state with density matrix ρ=exp(-βH)/Tr(exp(-βH)), or is there also a pure thermal state?
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about what happens for T=1/\beta \rightarrow 0!
 
ρ→1 and we get a pure state, is that correct?
So there are pure thermal state, they are just thermal state at an (ideal) zero temperature?
If I am right, do such pure thermal states exist in nature?
Thanks a lot for your help!
 
As long as the ground state is not degenerate, the zero temperature limit does give a pure state. However, one can never really reach zero temperature by cooling in the physical world. On the other hand, there are other ways to prepare a nearly isolated pure state.

In fact, there is a sense in which pure states may display thermal properties. Imagine a closed system begun in some pure initial state which evolves unitarily. If the initial state is, on average, highly excited (e.g. has a finite energy density above the ground state), then one would expect on general grounds that the system should "thermalize" in some sense. Yet the state of the whole system must remain pure. However, as long as we look at small pieces of the whole system, we may imagine that the rest of the system acts as an effective bath, and the state of the small subsystem may look thermal.
 
A pure state is by definition described by a statistical operator that is a projection operator
\hat{\rho}=|\psi \rangle \langle \psi|
with a normalized state vector |\psi \rangle, i.e., with
\langle \psi|\psi \rangle.
Indeed if the ground state is not degenerate, then
\lim_{T \rightarrow 0} \hat{\rho}_{\text{can}} = |\Omega \rangle \langle \Omega|,
where |\Omega \rangle is the energy-eigenvector for the lowest energy-eigenvalue, and this is uniquely defined (up to a phase, which cancels in the statistical operator).

To stress it again: The identity operator generally cannot be a proper statistical operator, because for usual physical systems the state space is a true infinitely-dimensional Hilbert space, and a statistical operator must have trace 1. The identity operator in a proper Hilbert space has no finite trace and thus cannot represent a mixed state.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Back
Top