Are these cis/trans isomers? Why or why

  • Thread starter Thread starter Westlund2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isomers
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the identification of cis/trans isomers in certain molecules. Participants explore the criteria that define cis/trans isomerism, including structural considerations and the implications of ring structures.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the molecules in question are cis/trans isomers because the O and OH groups can be switched, suggesting flexibility in their arrangement.
  • Another participant questions what specific criteria are necessary for two molecules to be classified as cis/trans isomers, indicating a need for clarification on the definition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on whether the molecules are cis/trans isomers, as differing viewpoints on the criteria and structural implications are presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion lacks detailed definitions of cis/trans isomerism and does not clarify the specific structural features of the molecules being analyzed, which may affect the conclusions drawn.

Westlund2
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Are these cis/trans isomers? Why or why not?

pk1132.png


pk1121.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Let's hear your take on it first.
 


Yes, because the O and the OH can be switched. Because the ring structure can not be changed?
espen180 said:
Let's hear your take on it first.
 


Given two molecules, what is needed for them to be called cis/trans-isomers?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K