Are These Statements About Limits True?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vbplaya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two statements about limits in calculus. The first statement, "If lim x→c = L, then f(c) = L," is false, as demonstrated by a counterexample where a removable discontinuity exists at c. The second statement, "If f(x) < g(x) for all x≠a, then lim x→a f(x) < lim x→a g(x)," is also false; a counterexample shows that both limits can be equal despite the inequality holding for all other x. Understanding these concepts is crucial for mastering calculus, as limits form the foundation of the subject. Engaging with limits, despite their complexity, is essential for deeper mathematical comprehension.
vbplaya
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hey, I just need help with these two statements about limits which happens to be my least favorite topic of calculus. I just need to know if they are true or false and why.

If lim x→c =L, then f(c) = L.

I don't think that is true because f(c) may not always equal L? or is the statement true? I'm not sure


Also:
If f(x) < g(x) for all x≠a, then lim x→a f(x) < lim x→a g(x)

I'm not sure about this one either. I know that if f(x)=g(x) for all x≠c in an open interval containing c, and their limits exists, then lim x→c f(x) = lim x→c g(x). But I don't know if it's is the same for this inequality.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think they're both correct. I'm no master with limits either. They are an awkward concept to grasp, but you should take time and fight the repulsion, because limits are the foundation of calculus. You'll be able to solve run of the mill problems without them, but in order to really understand what's going on, you've got to try to understand them.

That said, I didn't really understand them until the second half of calc 2 heh.
 
vbplaya said:
Hey, I just need help with these two statements about limits which happens to be my least favorite topic of calculus. I just need to know if they are true or false and why.

If lim x→c =L, then f(c) = L.

I don't think that is true because f(c) may not always equal L? or is the statement true? I'm not sure


Also:
If f(x) < g(x) for all x≠a, then lim x→a f(x) < lim x→a g(x)

I'm not sure about this one either. I know that if f(x)=g(x) for all x≠c in an open interval containing c, and their limits exists, then lim x→c f(x) = lim x→c g(x). But I don't know if it's is the same for this inequality.

Both of your statements are false.

*Statement #1 counterexample:
\text{Let} \; f ( x ) = \frac{{x^2 + x - 6}}{{x - 2}}
Then,
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} f\left( x \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} \frac{{x^2 + x - 6}}{{x - 2}} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 2} x + 3 = 5

but the removable discontinuity
f\left( 2 \right){\text{ does not exist}}{\text{.}}

*Statement #2 counterexample:
{\text{Let }}f\left( x \right) = 2x - 1\;{\text{and }}g\left( x \right) = x^2

Which satisfies \forall x \ne 1,\;f\left( x \right) &lt; g\left( x \right)

But,
\mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 1} f\left( x \right) = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{x \to 1} g\left( x \right) = 1

and 1 =1 :biggrin:
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top