Are these the correct expressions for ## dF/dy' ##?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying the expressions for the derivative dF/dy' for different functions. The first expression, dF/dy' = (1/4)(1+y'^2)^{-3/4}·2y', is confirmed to be correct for F(y') = (1+y'^2)^{1/4}. The second expression, dF/dy' = cos(y'), is also verified for F(y') = sin(y'). There is confusion regarding the notation 'exp', which is clarified to mean e^{y'}, leading to the conclusion that dF/dy' = e^{y'} for F(y') = exp(y'). The thread concludes with a consensus on the correctness of the derivatives provided.
Math100
Messages
816
Reaction score
229
Homework Statement
Find the expressions for ## dF/dy' ## when
a) ## F(y')=(1+y'^2)^{\frac{1}{4}} ##
b) ## F(y')=sin (y') ##
c) ## F(y')=exp(y') ##
Relevant Equations
None.
a) ## dF/dy'=\frac{1}{4}(1+y'^2)^{\frac{-3}{4}}\cdot 2y' ##
b) ## dF/dy'=cos (y') ##

I just took the derivatives above and found out these expressions, but may anyone please check/verify to see if these expressions for ## dF/dy' ## are correct? Also, I do not understand part c). What does 'exp' indicate in here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Math100 said:
Homework Statement: Find the expressions for ## dF/dy' ## when
a) ## F(y')=(1+y'^2)^{\frac{1}{4}} ##
b) ## F(y')=sin (y') ##
c) ## F(y')=exp(y') ##
Relevant Equations: None.

a) ## dF/dy'=\frac{1}{4}(1+y'^2)^{\frac{-3}{4}}\cdot 2y' ##
b) ## dF/dy'=cos (y') ##

I just took the derivatives above and found out these expressions, but may anyone please check/verify to see if these expressions for ## dF/dy' ## are correct? Also, I do not understand part c). What does 'exp' indicate in here?
##\exp(y')## means ##e^{y'}.##

What you wrote is correct, but why is there a prime at the ##y##'s? The same could be written with just ##y## or ##t## as the variable name. ##y'## normally indicates a derivative.
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD and Math100
fresh_42 said:
##\exp(y')## means ##e^{y'}.##

What you wrote is correct, but why is there a prime at the ##y##'s? The same could be written with just ##y## or ##t## as the variable name. ##y'## normally indicates a derivative.
I don't know either. So what should the book normally express these primes then, instead? Also, if ## exp(y') ## mean ## e^{y'} ##. Then the expression for ## dF/dy' ## is ## dF/dy'=e^{y'} ##?
 
Math100 said:
I don't know either. So what should the book normally express these primes then, instead? Also, if ## exp(y') ## mean ## e^{y'} ##. Then the expression for ## dF/dy' ## is ## dF/dy'=e^{y'} ##?
Yes.
 
fresh_42 said:
Yes.
Thank you so much for verifying!
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...