Are these two linear maps equivalent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter roman93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent Linear
roman93
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
let S: A ->B and T: B -> C be linear maps.
Then
TS : A -> B -> C.
But am I right in thinking that the map T': Im(A) -> C is the same as TS?

If this is wrong, can you explain why please :)

Thanks very much in advance!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What is Im(A)?
 
My guess would be imaginary part.
 
micromass said:
What is Im(A)?

Whovian said:
My guess would be imaginary part.

Im(A) is Image(A) or the space that we get when we apply the linear transformation S to A.
Also T' is the same transformation as T but just on a different domain.

I guess what I wrote in OP was wrong, but is it fine to say that Image(T') = Image(TS),
so Rank(T') = Rank(TS) ?
 
roman93 said:
Im(A) is Image(A) or the space that we get when we apply the linear transformation S to A.

The correct notation is Im(S) or S(A). The notation Im(A) is not in use.
I guess what I wrote in OP was wrong, but is it fine to say that Image(T') = Image(TS),
so Rank(T') = Rank(TS) ?

That is indeed correct.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top