Are these two vectors coprime?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phynewb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the coprimality of two vectors defined as (x1, x2) and (y1, y2). It explains that for vectors to be coprime, their linear combination a(x1, x2) + b(y1, y2) must yield a new vector n(z1, z2) where gcf(z1, z2) = 1. Examples illustrate that (2,3) and (1,3) are not coprime, while (7,3) and (2,1) are coprime, based on their linear combinations and the properties of their greatest common factors. The discussion also seeks criteria for proving coprimality in vectors and inquires about generalizing this concept to vectors with n components. The thread suggests a potential relocation to the Number Theory forum for more focused discussion.
phynewb
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi guys

I have a question about the coprime of two vectors
For two vectors (x1,x2) and (y1,y2).
Given a,b with gcf (a,b)=1 .i.e. relatively prime.
I do the linear combination of two vectors
a(x1,x2)+b(y1,y2)=n(z1,z2) with some common factor n and gcf(z1,z2)=1.
If n=1 for any a,b, two vectors are said co-prime.
I wonder if any criteria to prove two vectors are coprime.
For example, (2,3),(1,3) are not coprime b/c (2,3)+(1,3)=3(1,2).
But (7,3),(2,1) are coprime b/c a(7,3)+b(2,1)=(7a+2b,3a+b) and gcf(7a+2b,3a+b)=gcf(a,3a+b)=gcf(a,b)=1.
Also how to generalize it to vectors with n components?

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know if there's a name for this operation.
But I can recommend that you move the thread to the Number Theory forum, it seems to belong there more.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top