Are they ever going to open more reactor colleges?

  • Context: Schools 
  • Thread starter Thread starter php111
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reactor
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the availability of nuclear engineering programs and reactor colleges in the United States, particularly in the northeastern region. Participants explore the number of institutions offering nuclear engineering degrees, the presence of reactors, and the implications of these factors on education and the nuclear engineering job market.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that in Pennsylvania, there is only one college with a nuclear engineering program, which is Penn State, and expresses concern over the lack of nearby options.
  • Another participant mentions the University of Florida (UF) has a reactor and a well-regarded nuclear engineering program, clarifying that UF stands for the University of Florida in Gainesville, FL.
  • It is pointed out that having a reactor on-site is not strictly necessary for a university to maintain a strong nuclear engineering program, drawing parallels to other engineering disciplines.
  • A participant highlights the distinction between schools offering nuclear engineering degrees and those with reactors, citing examples like the University of Illinois and Reed College.
  • Concerns are raised about the small market for nuclear engineers compared to other engineering fields, suggesting this may influence the number of programs available.
  • One participant expresses the view that environmental activism has contributed to a decline in the field of nuclear physics.
  • Another participant attributes challenges in the nuclear field to the influence of the oil industry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the necessity of reactors for nuclear engineering programs and the impact of external factors on the field. There is no consensus on the reasons for the limited number of nuclear engineering programs or the future of such colleges.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various institutions and their offerings, but there is uncertainty regarding the completeness of the information about nuclear engineering programs across states. The discussion does not resolve the question of whether more reactor colleges will open in the future.

php111
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hey,

The question is. Are they ever going to open more Nuclear Engineering reactor colleges? I know in the WHOLE state of PA, there are "1" college and it's Penn State main campus. 0 are in NJ. 1 in NY but I think not sure might close out the reactor in NY. The college is Cornell in upstate. So after that, they are really none close by. Unless we travel south or south west. Not sure if they are any south. There is a college in Texas. I think it's called A&M, never been to Texas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
UF has a reactor. I used to walk past it every day. I believe their nuclear engineering program is fairly highly regarded as well.
 
jhicks said:
UF has a reactor. I used to walk past it every day. I believe their nuclear engineering program is fairly highly regarded as well.

Hey jhicks,

What does UF stand for and what state is it in?
 
"Reactor college" sounds a little like "barber college" or "clown college".

It's not necessary for a university to have a reactor on site to have a healthy nuclear engineering program. A university can have a healthy aeronautical engineering program without owning its own fleet of airplanes, right? There are of course advantages to having one, but it's not strictly necessary.

There are about 30 university owned reactors. Since there are about 50 states (some say 57), it shouldn't be surprising that most states have one or zero.

Having to travel some distance to get a proper education is really nothing new.
 
Then why did I only found one college in PA for Nuclear Engineering and it's Penn State? What colleges in PA offers Nuclear Engineering besides Penn State?






Vanadium 50 said:
"Reactor college" sounds a little like "barber college" or "clown college".

It's not necessary for a university to have a reactor on site to have a healthy nuclear engineering program. A university can have a healthy aeronautical engineering program without owning its own fleet of airplanes, right? There are of course advantages to having one, but it's not strictly necessary.

There are about 30 university owned reactors. Since there are about 50 states (some say 57), it shouldn't be surprising that most states have one or zero.

Having to travel some distance to get a proper education is really nothing new.
 
There is a difference between a school that offers a nuclear engineering degree and one with a reactor. University of Illinois has a degree program, but no reactor (any more). Reed College has a reactor, but no engineering degree program.

The market for nuclear engineers is much, much smaller than that for EE's. How many schools in Pennsylvania offer a BSEE? Penn, Penn State, Carnegie-Mellon, Layfette, Drexel and maybe some other. Perhaps eight? Maybe ten? Out of maybe 150 or 200 colleges and universities?
 
  • #10
Penn State is the only college in PA with a nuclear engineering program
 
  • #11
I think misinformed eco activists and such have pushed the field of nuclear physics into a decline.
 
  • #12
I usually blame the entrenched oil oligarchy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K