Are those shooting stars or satellites in the night sky?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion between shooting stars (meteors) and satellites observed in the night sky. Participants note that meteors typically last only seconds and can be seen frequently under dark skies, while satellites move more slowly and appear in predictable arcs. It's highlighted that witnessing multiple meteors in one night is common, as is seeing several satellites, especially shortly after sunset or before sunrise when they reflect sunlight. The distinction is made that if a light streaks by quickly, it is likely a meteor, whereas satellites take longer to cross the sky. Overall, both phenomena can be observed in significant numbers during clear nights away from city lights.
scarecrow
Messages
139
Reaction score
0
One summer night in 2005 I was out on my roof with a couple of my friends, and the sky was perfectly clear. We could see thousands of stars, it was amazing. We were in the countryside far away from any city lights.

Well, the entire night we were just star gazing and every 5 minutes we would see a "shooting star" (or that's what we thought at the time). The light would streak across the sky, so if you were looking directly up at the sky (90 degrees), the streaking lights would zip by from west to east.

Is it possible to see at least 20 shooting stars in one night, or were the streaking lights in fact satellites? How often do satellites pass? How many satellites orbit the earth?

Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Satellites are slow: Six minutes or so to cross the sky if the go straight overhead. If it zipped by, it was a shooting star.
 
Satellites are almost a little eerie when you first spot them. They appear to move relatively slowly -- airliners usually appear to move significantly faster. They move in such perfect arcs and with such steady speed that sometimes you spot one and think your mind is playing tricks on you.

Meteors, on the other hand, usually last only seconds. They can and do occur at all hours of the day and night. Seeing a dozen or more over the course of an evening under dark skies is not exceptional.

- Warren
 
...and seeing a dozen or more satellites over the course of a dark evening is not exceptional either.

One thing about satellites: since to see them they need to reflect sunlight, you will see the most for a few hours after sunset and before sunrise.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top