Are we going in a particular direction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silverbackman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses the nature of the universe's expansion and its historical timeline, emphasizing that the Big Bang occurred everywhere, not at a single point. It clarifies that diagrams depicting the universe's history represent a timeline, indicating our perception of moving from past to future. The universe is not traveling toward a specific destination; rather, space itself is expanding, causing all matter to move apart. The conversation highlights the complexity of defining directions in the universe, as each observer has a unique reference frame. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the dynamics of cosmic expansion.
Silverbackman
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Many "history of the universe" pictures show the singularity or big bang at one section and the modern universe in the other direction. Examples;

http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/Evolution/History of the Universe.gif

http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/ContentMedia/990053_2s.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/b/b4/Universe_expansion.png

So is the universe traveling a particular path while expanding? And if we were to go back to the other end of the universe would we arrive at where the singularity is (or was)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Space news on Phys.org
The short answer is: No!

However, a fuller answer would also explain that in such a diagram the line along which the universe appears to travel is the time line. So in a sense the universe is travelling, or at least our conscious perception is that it is travelling, from the past into the future.

The BB happened everywhere, and everywhere is expanding away from everwhere else in the expanding universe; it is space itself that expands and carries everything else along with it.

I hope this helps,

Garth
 
Last edited:
Hard to give directions in the universe. The only reference frame that is relevant is yours. Lorentz started this mess, and Einstein finished it off with GR.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Back
Top