Are You Paying More for Dangerous Instructions in Your Book?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on two editions of the same book by the same author, highlighting a significant price difference despite the new edition being only 16 pages shorter. The conversation notes that the new edition corrects faulty instructions found in the first edition that could potentially cause harm, raising questions about the value of the two versions. Participants reflect on the peculiarities of collecting flawed items, comparing them to other collectibles, and mention the rarity of the book due to a recall by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. The topic also touches on the challenges of recalling books due to First Amendment issues and the technical aspects of book binding that can lead to such discrepancies in page count.
BobG
Science Advisor
Messages
352
Reaction score
88
Two books, same title, same subject, same author.

Two radically different prices:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0764574086/?tag=pfamazon01-20
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0764554964/?tag=pfamazon01-20

The new edition is 16 pages shorter. What are the odds of a book being shortened by exactly 16 pages? But what a savings! Those extra 16 pages cost $4.30 each?

Well, actually, there is a slightly more significant difference in the content than just missing 16 pages. The instructions for making lye in one of the books were faulty and a person following the instructions could be burned.

Any guesses which version contains the faulty instructions?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
First edition, most likely...
 
I had a Gutenberg bible but I tossed it out when I got a paperback that had fewer typos in it.
 
Jimmy Snyder said:
I had a Gutenberg bible but I tossed it out when I got a paperback that had fewer typos in it.

lol.
 
I guess the economics is a strange quirk of collecting. Flawed stamps are more valuable than the properly printed stamps. Flawed light bulbs (twisted filaments, etc) are worth more than properly manufactured light bulbs.

Why don't people collect sensible things, such as slide rules. Flawed slide rules are worth less than a slide rule in near perfect condition, complete with near perfect case and instructions.

Or pens. You don't see pen collectors salivating over flawed pens.
 
perceived or real rarity due to flaws>nondescript functional object

people aren't utilitarian
 
G037H3 said:
perceived or real rarity due to flaws>nondescript functional object

people aren't utilitarian

In this case, the book has a special rarity. It was recalled by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

It's hard for the government to recall a book because of First Amendment concerns. The few books that have been recalled are books on home repair that give faulty instructions on how to rewire your home.
 
The 16-page change is a function of binding. Print the pages in folios, fold, bind and trim.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
560
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top