Area of a Triangle and Elliptic Curves - Birch and Swinnerton Dyer Conjecture

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
In the book by Keith Devlin on the Millenium Problems - in Chapter 6 on the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture we find the following text:

"It is a fairly straightforward piece of algebraic reasoning to show that there is a right triangle with rational sides having an area d if and only if the equation:

y^2 = x^3 - d^2 x

has rational solutions for x and y with

(Note: Devlin has defined d as a positive whole number earlier on)

Can someone please supply the straightforward algebra to show that:

There is a right triangle with rational sides having an area d if and only if the equation:

y^2 = x^3 - d^2 x

has rational solutions for x and y with y \ne 0"


Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's a bit disingenuous to say that this is straightforward. Sure, if someone gives you the substitutions then you can execute them with no difficulty. But coming up with these substitutions on your own is not so trivial (in my opinion).

Anyway, the key phrase here is "congruence number". See section 3 here for the details you're after.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top