Area of figure, resulting from unit square transformation

Myr73
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
1- Let the linear operator on R^2 have the following matrix:A = 1 0
-1 3

What is the area of the figure that results from applying this transformation to the unit square?

2- I am abit confused here, I thought that the matrix for the unit square would be,
0 0
1 0
0 1
1 1...
But apparently that is not it.

And after finding the unit square matrix, I blv I would find the images of it by computing A^Tx

I am not sure though
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A square would be four points. You seem to have collected four points that make up one particular unit square, and arranged them as a 2x4 array. That is kind of odd.

What does it mean to be a linear operator on R^2? What does the operator A operate on? Hint: R^2 means there are two real numbers involved. But there seem to be 8 real numbers involved in your square. So how is that going to work?
 
oh. ok, so are they asking to find the Ax? where x would be the unit square.. so like
[10. ] [ 1 0]
[ 1 3 ] [ 01 ] ...
 
Last edited:
anyone?
 
That matrix is NOT the unit square. The unit square is a geometric figure, not a matrix, that has vertices at (0, 0), (1, 0), (1, 1), and (0, 1).
The bottom side, from (0, 0) to (1, 0), the vector \begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}, is mapped into
\begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 \\ -1 & 3\end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}1 \\ 0 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}1 \\ -1\end{bmatrix}

The left side, from (0, 0) to (0, 1), the vector \begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}, is mapped into
\begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 \\ -1 & 3 \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 3\end{bmatrix}

The other two sides get mapped into equivalent vectors so this is a parallelogram with vertices at (0, 0), (1, -1), (1, 2), and (0, 3).
It should be easy to find the area of that parallelogram.

(And, it is worth noting that this matrix has determinant 3.)
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top