Area Under a Load Vs Deflection Curve

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the area under a load versus deflection curve, particularly in the context of a concrete sample subjected to loading until failure. Participants explore whether this area represents energy absorption or work done, delving into the implications of integrating the curve function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions what the area under the load versus deflection curve signifies, suggesting it may represent energy absorption or work done.
  • Another participant asserts that the area under the curve has units of energy, linking it to the definition of work as force multiplied by distance.
  • A subsequent reply seeks clarification on whether energy absorption and work are equivalent, referencing a definition of work and its relation to energy transfer.
  • Another participant confirms that the units of work and energy are the same, providing an example involving potential energy.
  • One participant explains that when bending a beam, the area represents the work done on the beam and relates to the energy stored in the beam during elastic deformation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the area under the curve represents energy absorption or work done, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing interpretations.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of energy absorption and work, as well as the implications of elastic versus inelastic deformation in the context of the area under the curve.

tomtomtom1
Messages
160
Reaction score
8
Hi all

I was wondering if someone could help explain what the area under a load vs deflection curve tells you.

I have a concrete sample which I loaded until it failed.

I plotted the load (kN) and deflection (mm) as shown below.

My question is; if the curve in red can be represented as a function f(x) (which I can do via regression) and I integrated this function from 0 to 0.75 (0.75 was the deflection at failure) then what does this tell me?

What does the area under the curve tell you?

upload_2019-1-1_2-56-3.png


From my research the area under a load vs deflection curve is meant to represent energy absorption but others have said it actually represents Work done?

I was wondering if someone could explain?

Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-1-1_2-56-3.png
    upload_2019-1-1_2-56-3.png
    6.6 KB · Views: 3,420
Engineering news on Phys.org
Isn't is just a case of units? Work = force * distance. Work is energy. Load is a force. Displacement is a distance. So the area under that curve has units of energy.
 
anorlunda said:
Isn't is just a case of units? Work = force * distance. Work is energy. Load is a force. Displacement is a distance. So the area under that curve has units of energy.

Hi Anorlunda

I know I am being thick but I don't understand.

Are you saying the energy absorption and work are the same thing and if they are then the area under the curve tells you the Work?

Work is defined as "a force is said to do work if, when acting, there is a displacement of the point of application in the direction of the force. For example, when a ball is held above the ground and then dropped, the work done on the ball as it falls is equal to the weight of the ball (a force) multiplied by the distance to the ground (a displacement). Work transfers energy from one place to another, or one form to another. "

Thanks
 
Yes, the units of work and the units of energy are the same. When you lift or lower a ball to a different lev then stop, the work you did equals the change in potential energy.
 
If you are bending the beam the area is the work done by you on the beam. If the deformation is elastic then its also the same as the energy stored in the beam when bent. When you allow the beam to bend back straight it does work on you (or you do negative work on the beam).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K