Area Under Sine Wave: Anti Diff of -cosx

  • Thread starter Thread starter philrainey
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The area under the sine wave from 0 to 90 degrees can be calculated using the antiderivative of -cos(x), which yields the area as 1 unit when evaluated from -cos(90) to -cos(0). This calculation assumes the angle is in radians, as the derivatives of sine and cosine functions are valid only in this context. The discussion highlights that in more advanced mathematics, the variables t in sin(t) and cos(t) may not represent angles. The unit of area derived from this calculation is not simply "radian squared" but rather a unit of area consistent with the context of the problem. Understanding these nuances is essential for accurate mathematical interpretation.
philrainey
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
A little question when working out the area under a sin wave from 0 degrees to 90 degrees or some lower angle if you take the anti diff of -cosx, does that give the area under the graph assumming the angle is in radians? so enter -cos90=0 subtract -cos0 or-1 the area under the sine wave is 0--1 or one unit (what is this unit) one radian squared?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, in a simplified sense, d(sin x)dx = cos x and d(cos x)/dx= -sin x are only true if x is in radians.

I say "in a simplified sense" because the ways in which sin(t) and cos(t) are defined in more advanced mathematics, t is not an angle at all.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top