Solving Arrhenius Eqn: Double Reaction Rate at 10°C

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the conditions under which a 10°C increase doubles the reaction rate, referencing the Arrhenius equation. Participants clarify that the activation energy (Ea) is essential for understanding reaction rates, and the equation ln(k) - ln(2k) = (-Ea/R) [(1/T1)-(1/T2)] is used to explore this relationship. It is suggested to substitute "T1+10" for "T2" to analyze the effect of temperature on the rate constant. There is some confusion about whether to use actual values for rate constants or arbitrary ones, but the focus remains on solving for Ea. Ultimately, the goal is to understand how Ea relates to reaction rates when temperature changes.
fk378
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A common rule of thumb is that temperature 10 degrees C for many reactions will double the reaction rate. Derive under what conditions this is true.

Homework Equations


ln(k) - ln(2k) = (-Ea/R) [(1/T1)-(1/T2)]

The Attempt at a Solution


I know I have to start off by plugging in values for T1 and T2, but what exactly am I trying to solve for? My teacher said to solve for Ea, but that is the measure of kinetic energy needed for reaction...what do I solve for when looking for reaction rate?

Also, can I leave the rate constants in or should I plug in actual values for those as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I had the exact same question on a quiz, but instead we were given the room temperature. Indeed you do want to solve for Ea. You'll want to plug in values for ln k & temp. Think arbitrary values for what you want to plug in for the numbers, as long as they all relate to each other.
 
But what value of Ea am I looking for? If I'm plugging in all my values into that equation that I typed up there, of course I'll just get a value for Ea.
And why am I solving for Ea anyway? How will I know what the reaction rate is if I know Ea?
 
The equation you are using is incorrect.

http://alt1.mathlinks.ro/Forum/latexrender/pictures/1/b/a/1bacaba62a260d46b7600cc644b6bba500f54b3b.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm using the same equation as that...I'm just changing the locations of the corresponding k1/T1 and k2/T2 values.
 
Nice derivation, Roco. Rewrite the expression and solve for Ea. Use "T1+10" in place of "T2".
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top